» Articles » PMID: 35925576

A New Approach to Simplifying and Harmonizing Cancer Clinical Trials-Standardizing Eligibility Criteria

Overview
Journal JAMA Oncol
Specialty Oncology
Date 2022 Aug 4
PMID 35925576
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Importance: Clinical trial sponsors rely on eligibility criteria to control the characteristics of patients in their studies, promote the safety of participants, and optimize the interpretation of results. However, in recent years, complex and often overly restrictive inclusion and exclusion criteria have created substantial barriers to patient access to novel therapies, hindered trial recruitment and completion, and limited generalizability of trial results. A LUNGevity Foundation working group developed a framework for lung cancer clinical trial eligibility criteria. The goals of this framework are to (1) simplify eligibility criteria, (2) facilitate stakeholders' (patients, clinicians, and sponsors) search for appropriate trials, and (3) harmonize trial populations to support intertrial comparisons of treatment effects.

Observations: Clinicians and representatives from the pharmaceutical industry, the National Cancer Institute, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the European Medicines Agency, and the LUNGevity Foundation undertook a process to identify and prioritize key items for inclusion in trial eligibility criteria. The group generated a prioritized library of terms to guide investigators and sponsors in the design of first-line, advanced non-small cell lung cancer clinical trials intended to support marketing application. These recommendations address disease stage and histologic features, enrollment biomarkers, performance status, organ function, brain metastases, and comorbidities. This effort forms the basis for a forthcoming FDA draft guidance for industry.

Conclusions And Relevance: As an initial step, the recommended cross-trial standardization of eligibility criteria may harmonize trial populations. Going forward, by connecting diverse stakeholders and providing formal opportunity for public input, the emerging FDA draft guidance may also provide an opportunity to revise and simplify long-standing approaches to trial eligibility. This work serves as a prototype for similar efforts now underway for other cancers.

Citing Articles

Brief Report: Real-World Eligibility for Clinical Trials in Patients With Extensive-Stage SCLC at a Tertiary Care Center.

Dehar N, Meem M, Aggarwal I, Hopman W, Gaudreau P, Robinson A JTO Clin Res Rep. 2024; 5(7):100696.

PMID: 39091596 PMC: 11293570. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtocrr.2024.100696.


What Is Ailing Oncology Clinical Trials? Can We Fix Them?.

Mittal A, Moore S, Navani V, Jiang D, Stewart D, Liu G Curr Oncol. 2024; 31(7):3738-3751.

PMID: 39057147 PMC: 11276279. DOI: 10.3390/curroncol31070275.


North American Cancer Center Clinical Research Capacity and Benchmarking in the Postpandemic Era.

Kasner M, Fritsche A, Leong M, Cameron K, Lee C, Lin T JCO Oncol Pract. 2024; 20(12):1612-1619.

PMID: 38950320 PMC: 11649174. DOI: 10.1200/OP.24.00164.


Quantitative evaluation of the impact of relaxing eligibility criteria on the risk-benefit profile of drugs for lung cancer based on real-world data.

Huang H, Jia S, Wang X, Miao H, Fang H, He H Thorac Cancer. 2024; 15(14):1187-1194.

PMID: 38576119 PMC: 11091778. DOI: 10.1111/1759-7714.15269.


Eligibility criteria: too big, too small or just right?.

Atallah E Haematologica. 2023; 109(4):1021.

PMID: 37822257 PMC: 10985446. DOI: 10.3324/haematol.2023.283972.


References
1.
Kim E, Bruinooge S, Roberts S, Ison G, Lin N, Gore L . Broadening Eligibility Criteria to Make Clinical Trials More Representative: American Society of Clinical Oncology and Friends of Cancer Research Joint Research Statement. J Clin Oncol. 2017; 35(33):3737-3744. PMC: 5692724. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2017.73.7916. View

2.
Osarogiagbon R, Merino Vega D, Fashoyin-Aje L, Wedam S, Ison G, Atienza S . Modernizing Clinical Trial Eligibility Criteria: Recommendations of the ASCO-Friends of Cancer Research Prior Therapies Work Group. Clin Cancer Res. 2021; 27(9):2408-2415. PMC: 8170959. DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-20-3854. View

3.
Garcia S, Bisen A, Yan J, Xie X, Ramalingam S, Schiller J . Thoracic Oncology Clinical Trial Eligibility Criteria and Requirements Continue to Increase in Number and Complexity. J Thorac Oncol. 2017; 12(10):1489-1495. PMC: 5610621. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2017.07.020. View

4.
Berghoff A, Venur V, Preusser M, Ahluwalia M . Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Brain Metastases: From Biology to Treatment. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2016; 35:e116-22. DOI: 10.1200/EDBK_100005. View

5.
Neeman E, Gresham G, Ovasapians N, Hendifar A, Tuli R, Figlin R . Comparing Physician and Nurse Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG-PS) Ratings as Predictors of Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Cancer. Oncologist. 2019; 24(12):e1460-e1466. PMC: 6975959. DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2018-0882. View