» Articles » PMID: 35925283

[Reality of Care of Patella Stabilizing Operations : A status Quo Among Active Members of the German Society for Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery (DGOU)]

Overview
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2022 Aug 4
PMID 35925283
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Patellofemoral instability is one of the most common pathologies of the knee joint. The planning and implementation of patella-stabilizing operations are very variable. With regard to the operative measures, the preoperative planning is of decisive importance, especially with regard to the complexity of underlying pathologies.

Objectives: The aim of this study was to depict the current healthcare reality in relation to planning and implementation of patella stabilizing operations in Germany. Furthermore, it was to be ascertained whether automated analysis options would facilitate the planning and implementation of surgical procedures (in primary and revision cases).

Materials And Methods: An online survey with 16 questions was collected by email among all active members of the German Society of Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery. 7974 members were surveyed; 393 responses could then be analyzed.

Results: MPFL-reconstruction (89.8%) is the most frequently performed procedure, followed by tibial tubercle transfers (64.9%), osteotomies (51.2%), and trochleoplasty (19.9%). The choice of surgical approach is mainly based on a combination of clinical and radiological findings (90.3%). MRI imaging (81.2%), standard X‑ray images (77.4%), and full leg images (76.6%) are mainly used for operative treatment decisions. 59.3% of the respondents would appreciate better preoperative planning and 59.0% would implement more radiologically detectable parameters in their individual preoperative planning if these were automatically available.

Conclusions: The findings of this survey among members of the DGOU identify the MPFL-reconstruction as the central operative approach in the treatment of patellofemoral instabilities, whereas MRI imaging is the diagnostic tool of choice. Future establishment of automated software-based analysis methods could allow a large number of surgeons to expand the radiological parameters taken into account when planning patella-stabilizing operations.

Citing Articles

[Current diagnostics and treatment of ankle sprains in German].

Lichte P, Weber C, Otto M, Blasius F, Gutteck N, Hildebrand F Unfallchirurgie (Heidelb). 2024; 127(6):449-456.

PMID: 38634870 PMC: 11133181. DOI: 10.1007/s00113-024-01428-y.


The International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury: Classification Accuracy and Challenges.

Snider B, Eren F, Reeves R, Rupp R, Kirshblum S Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2023; 29(1):1-15.

PMID: 36819931 PMC: 9936898. DOI: 10.46292/sci22-00036.

References
1.
Liu J, Steinhaus M, Kalbian I, Post W, Green D, Strickland S . Patellar Instability Management: A Survey of the International Patellofemoral Study Group. Am J Sports Med. 2017; 46(13):3299-3306. DOI: 10.1177/0363546517732045. View

2.
Fithian D, Paxton E, Stone M, Silva P, Davis D, Elias D . Epidemiology and natural history of acute patellar dislocation. Am J Sports Med. 2004; 32(5):1114-21. DOI: 10.1177/0363546503260788. View

3.
Weber A, Nathani A, Dines J, Allen A, Shubin-Stein B, Arendt E . An Algorithmic Approach to the Management of Recurrent Lateral Patellar Dislocation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016; 98(5):417-27. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.O.00354. View

4.
Seeley M, Knesek M, Vanderhave K . Osteochondral injury after acute patellar dislocation in children and adolescents. J Pediatr Orthop. 2013; 33(5):511-8. DOI: 10.1097/BPO.0b013e318288b7a0. View

5.
Cofield R, Bryan R . Acute dislocation of the patella: results of conservative treatment. J Trauma. 1977; 17(7):526-31. DOI: 10.1097/00005373-197707000-00007. View