» Articles » PMID: 35922106

Online Information in Spanish on Probiotics, Yoghurt, Kefir, Kombucha, Fibre and Prebiotics: an Analysis of the Quality of Information and the Certainty of the Evidence Supporting Health Claims

Overview
Journal BMJ Open
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2022 Aug 3
PMID 35922106
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To examine the certainty of the evidence supporting health claims about probiotics, yoghurt, kefir, kombucha, fibre and prebiotics, and to assess the quality of online information in Spanish.

Design: Content analysis.

Methods: We compiled a data set of 114 web pages by searching six popular search phrases in Spanish relating to probiotics, yoghurt, kefir, kombucha, fibre and prebiotics on Google.es and coded them for typology and health claims. We examined the certainty of the evidence for health claims from systematic reviews. Information quality was assessed according to 10 criteria, where a web page: mentions scientific publications and reports their conclusions; quantifies relative and absolute effects; acknowledges some limitations; discusses certainty of evidence; reports the potential harms, alternatives and costs; and does not argue based on personal experiences.

Results: Gastrointestinal health (86.0%), general health (57.9%), cardiovascular health (53.5%) and immune system health (50.9%) were the most widely mentioned topics. Half of claims (52.6%, 70/133) were supported by evidence from systematic reviews. Probiotics had the highest number of claims supported by evidence and kombucha the lowest. The highest certainty was found for antibiotic-associated diarrhoea, necrotising enterocolitis and otitis (moderate) in probiotics and yoghurt, infectious diarrhoea and hepatic encephalopathy (moderate) in prebiotics, and cardiovascular health (high to moderate) and colorectal cancer (moderate) in fibre. On a scale of 0-10, the median information quality score for all web pages was 3. Only 18.4% reported study conclusions, 7.9% quantified the effects, 28.9% acknowledged some limitations in the research and 42.1% reported potential harms.

Conclusions: Most online health claims for dietary interventions intended for improving health through the gut microbiome are supported by low or very low certainty of evidence. Online information does not align with the evidence and is incomplete or unbalanced.

Citing Articles

Assessment of the quality of online information on dietary recommendations for inflammatory bowel disease.

Liu Y, He L, Guo H, Xiang L, Song X, Tan W Digit Health. 2024; 10:20552076241277033.

PMID: 39224792 PMC: 11367597. DOI: 10.1177/20552076241277033.


The individual-level effects of social media campaigns related to healthy eating, physical activity, and healthy weight: A narrative review.

Luo Y, Maafs-Rodriguez A, Hatfield D Obes Sci Pract. 2024; 10(1):e731.

PMID: 38187123 PMC: 10767147. DOI: 10.1002/osp4.731.


Are popular books about diet and health written based on scientific evidence? A comparison of citations between the USA and Japan.

Oono F, Adachi R, Yaegashi A, Kishino M, Ogata R, Kinugawa A Public Health Nutr. 2023; 26(12):2815-2825.

PMID: 37955110 PMC: 10755443. DOI: 10.1017/S1368980023002549.

References
1.
Alioshkin Cheneguin A, Salvat I, Romay Barrero H, Lacomba M . How good is online information on fibromyalgia? An analysis of quality and readability of websites on fibromyalgia in Spanish. BMJ Open. 2020; 10(7):e037065. PMC: 7337882. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037065. View

2.
Murray N, Al Khalaf S, Kaulmann D, Lonergan E, Cryan J, Clarke G . Compositional and functional alterations in the oral and gut microbiota in patients with psychosis or schizophrenia: A systematic review. HRB Open Res. 2021; 4:108. PMC: 8634050. DOI: 10.12688/hrbopenres.13416.1. View

3.
Hanage W . Microbiology: Microbiome science needs a healthy dose of scepticism. Nature. 2014; 512(7514):247-8. DOI: 10.1038/512247a. View

4.
Brozek J, Akl E, Alonso-Coello P, Lang D, Jaeschke R, Williams J . Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations in clinical practice guidelines. Part 1 of 3. An overview of the GRADE approach and grading quality of evidence about interventions. Allergy. 2009; 64(5):669-77. DOI: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2009.01973.x. View

5.
Shi Q, Tan L, Liu C, Wang H, Zhang J, Wang H . Comparative efficacy of pharmacological and nonpharmacological treatments for chronic idiopathic constipation in China: a Bayesian network meta-analysis. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2019; 19(1):311. PMC: 6857160. DOI: 10.1186/s12906-019-2741-z. View