» Articles » PMID: 35922017

Alpha Test of the Donor Conception Tool to Empower Parental Telling and Talking

Overview
Publisher Elsevier
Date 2022 Aug 3
PMID 35922017
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To conduct an alpha test of the prototype of a digital decision aid to help parents disclose donor conception to their children, the Donor Conception Tool to Empower Parental Telling and Talking (TELL Tool).

Design: Convergent mixed-methods design.

Setting: Virtual interviews in places convenient to the participants.

Participants: A purposeful sample (N = 16) of nine gamete-donor and embryo-recipient parents and eight clinicians, as one parent was also a clinician.

Methods: We conducted cognitive interviews to explore participants' perceptions about the TELL Tool prototype and observe patterns of use. The International Patient Decision Aid Standards (i.e., usability, comprehensibility, and acceptability) guided the development of the qualitative interview guide and directed the qualitative analysis. We also collected data about participants' perceptions and ratings of the helpfulness of each of the prototype's webpages regarding parents' decision making about disclosure. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the helpfulness ratings before we merged the two data sets to optimize understanding.

Results: Participants reported that the TELL Tool was a helpful digital decision aid to help parents tell their children how they were conceived. Most (93.7%) webpage rating scores indicated that the content was very helpful or helpful. The participants identified content and technical areas that needed refinement and provided specific recommendations such as adding concise instructions (usability), tailoring adolescent language (comprehensibility), and softening verbiage (acceptability).

Conclusion: Alpha testing guided by the International Patient Decision Aid standards was an essential step in refining and improving the TELL Tool prototype before beta testing.

Citing Articles

Parents' disclosure to their donor-conceived children in the last 10 years and factors affecting disclosure: a narrative review.

Duff M, Goedeke S Hum Reprod Update. 2024; 30(4):488-527.

PMID: 38687968 PMC: 11215159. DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dmae010.

References
1.
Isaksson S, Sydsjo G, Skoog Svanberg A, Lampic C . Disclosure behaviour and intentions among 111 couples following treatment with oocytes or sperm from identity-release donors: follow-up at offspring age 1-4 years. Hum Reprod. 2012; 27(10):2998-3007. PMC: 3442633. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/des285. View

2.
Hershberger P, Driessnack M, Kavanaugh K, Klock S . Oocyte donation disclosure decisions: a longitudinal follow-up at middle childhood. Hum Fertil (Camb). 2019; 24(1):31-45. DOI: 10.1080/14647273.2019.1567945. View

3.
Elwyn G, Kreuwel I, Durand M, Sivell S, Joseph-Williams N, Evans R . How to develop web-based decision support interventions for patients: a process map. Patient Educ Couns. 2010; 82(2):260-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2010.04.034. View

4.
Gerkowicz S, Crawford S, Hipp H, Boulet S, Kissin D, Kawwass J . Assisted reproductive technology with donor sperm: national trends and perinatal outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018; 218(4):421.e1-421.e10. PMC: 11056969. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.12.224. View

5.
Turner A, Coyle A . What does it mean to be a donor offspring? The identity experiences of adults conceived by donor insemination and the implications for counselling and therapy. Hum Reprod. 2000; 15(9):2041-51. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/15.9.2041. View