» Articles » PMID: 35919379

Development and Pilot Evaluation of an Electronic Health Record Usability and Safety Self-assessment Tool

Overview
Journal JAMIA Open
Date 2022 Aug 3
PMID 35919379
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: Poor electronic health record (EHR) usability contributes to clinician burnout and poses patent safety risks. Site-specific customization and configuration of EHRs require individual EHR system usability and safety testing which is resource intensive. We developed and pilot-tested a self-administered EHR usability and safety assessment tool, focused on computerized provider order entry (CPOE), which can be used by any facility to identify specific issues. In addition, the tool provides recommendations for improvement.

Materials And Methods: An assessment tool consisting of 104 questions was developed and pilot-tested at 2 hospitals, one using a Cerner EHR and the other using Epic. Five physicians at each site participated in and completed the assessment. Participant response accuracy compared to actual EHR interactions, consistency across participants, and usability issues identified through the tool were measured at each site.

Results: Across sites, participants answered an average of 46 questions in 23 min with 89.9% of responses either correct or partially correct. The tool identified 8 usability and safety issues at one site and 7 at the other site across medication, laboratory, and radiology CPOE functions.

Discussion: The tool shows promise as a method to rapidly evaluate EHR usability and safety and provide guidance on specific areas for improvement. Important improvements to the evaluation tool were identified including the need to clarify certain questions and provide definitions for usability terminology.

Conclusion: A self-administered usability and safety assessment tool can serve to identify specific usability and safety issues in the EHR and provide guidance for improvements.

Citing Articles

Realizing the Full Potential of Clinical Decision Support: Translating Usability Testing into Routine Practice in Health Care Operations.

Kandaswamy S, Williams H, Thompson S, Dawson T, Muthu N, Orenstein E Appl Clin Inform. 2024; 15(5):1039-1048.

PMID: 39191426 PMC: 11617071. DOI: 10.1055/a-2404-2129.


Inpatient EHR User Experience and Hospital EHR Safety Performance.

Classen D, Longhurst C, Davis T, Adler Milstein J, Bates D JAMA Netw Open. 2023; 6(9):e2333152.

PMID: 37695581 PMC: 10495862. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.33152.

References
1.
Ratwani R, Fairbanks T, Savage E, Adams K, Wittie M, Boone E . Mind the Gap. A systematic review to identify usability and safety challenges and practices during electronic health record implementation. Appl Clin Inform. 2016; 7(4):1069-1087. PMC: 5228144. DOI: 10.4338/ACI-2016-06-R-0105. View

2.
Gomes K, Ratwani R . Evaluating Improvements and Shortcomings in Clinician Satisfaction With Electronic Health Record Usability. JAMA Netw Open. 2019; 2(12):e1916651. PMC: 6991193. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.16651. View

3.
Koppel R, Metlay J, Cohen A, Abaluck B, Russell Localio A, Kimmel S . Role of computerized physician order entry systems in facilitating medication errors. JAMA. 2005; 293(10):1197-203. DOI: 10.1001/jama.293.10.1197. View

4.
Metzger J, Welebob E, Bates D, Lipsitz S, Classen D . Mixed results in the safety performance of computerized physician order entry. Health Aff (Millwood). 2010; 29(4):655-63. DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0160. View

5.
Guo J, Iribarren S, Kapsandoy S, Perri S, Staggers N . Usability Evaluation of An Electronic Medication Administration Record (eMAR) Application. Appl Clin Inform. 2013; 2(2):202-24. PMC: 3631925. DOI: 10.4338/ACI-2011-01-RA-0004. View