» Articles » PMID: 35918647

Acceptability of Telephone-cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (T-CPR) Practice in a Resource-limited Country- a Cross-sectional Study

Overview
Journal BMC Emerg Med
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Emergency Medicine
Date 2022 Aug 2
PMID 35918647
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: T-CPR has been shown to increase bystander CPR rates dramatically and is associated with improved patient survival.

Objective: To evaluate the acceptability of T-CPR by the bystanders and identify baseline quality measures of T-CPR in Karachi, Pakistan.

Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted from January to December 2018 at the Aman foundation command and control center. Data was collected from audiotaped phone calls of patients who required assistance from the Aman ambulance and on whom the EMS telecommunicator recognized the need for CPR and provided instructions. Information was recorded using a structured questionnaire on demographics, the status of the patient, and different time variables involved in CPR performance. A One-way ANOVA was used to compare different time variables with recommended AHA guidelines. P-value ≤ 0.05 was considered significant.

Results: There were 481 audiotaped calls in which CPR instruction was given, listened to, and recorded data. Out of which in 459(95.4%) of cases CPR was attempted Majority of the patients were males (n = 278; 57.8%) and most had witnessed cardiac arrest (n = 470; 97.7%) at home (n = 430; 89.3%). The mean time to recognize the need for CPR by an EMS telecommunicator was 4:59 ± 1:59(min), while the mean time to start CPR instruction by a bystander was 5:28 ± 2:24(min). The mean time to start chest compression was 6:04 ± 1:52(min.).

Conclusion: Our results show the high acceptability of T-CPR by bystanders. We also found considerable delays in recognizing cardiac arrest and initiation of CPR by telecommunicators. Further training of telecommunicators could reduce these delays.

Citing Articles

Pakistan's Emergency Medical Services (EMS) system & out-of-hospital-cardiac-arrest (OHCA): A narrative review of an EMS system of a low middle income country in context of OHCA.

Ali Baig M, Khan N, Naseer R, Akhter S, Shaikh A, Razzak J Resusc Plus. 2024; 18:100627.

PMID: 38590447 PMC: 11000191. DOI: 10.1016/j.resplu.2024.100627.


Methodological analysis of a community-based training initiative using the EPIS framework: an ongoing initiative to empower 10 million bystanders in CPR and bleeding control.

Hussain Merchant A, Hassan S, Baig N, Atiq H, Mahmood S, Doll A Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2023; 8(1):e001132.

PMID: 38020852 PMC: 10649812. DOI: 10.1136/tsaco-2023-001132.

References
1.
Bobrow B, Eisenberg M, Panczyk M . The Institute of Medicine Says Time to Act to Improve Cardiac Arrest Survival: Here's How. Ann Emerg Med. 2016; 67(4):492-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2015.11.004. View

2.
Maier M, Luger M, Baubin M . Telephone-assisted CPR: A literature review. Notf Rett Med. 2017; 19(6):468-472. PMC: 5584310. DOI: 10.1007/s10049-016-0210-5. View

3.
Travers A, Rea T, Bobrow B, Edelson D, Berg R, Sayre M . Part 4: CPR overview: 2010 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation. 2010; 122(18 Suppl 3):S676-84. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.970913. View

4.
Langlais B, Panczyk M, Sutter J, Fukushima H, Wu Z, Iwami T . Barriers to patient positioning for telephone cardiopulmonary resuscitation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Resuscitation. 2017; 115:163-168. DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2017.03.034. View

5.
Hardeland C, Claesson A, Blom M, Blomberg S, Folke F, Hollenberg J . Description of call handling in emergency medical dispatch centres in Scandinavia: recognition of out-of-hospital cardiac arrests and dispatcher-assisted CPR. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2021; 29(1):88. PMC: 8247132. DOI: 10.1186/s13049-021-00903-4. View