Fusion Mass Screws in Revision Spinal Deformity Surgery: A Simple and Safe Alternative Fixation

Overview

Journal Int J Spine Surg

Date 2022 Aug 2

PMID 35918142

Authors

Ashish Mittal

Alexander Rosinski

Khalid Odeh

Cristian Balcescu

Victor Ungurean Jr

Victor Ungurean Sr

Dimitriy G Kondrashov

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Revision spinal deformity surgery has a high rate of complications. Fixation may be challenging due to altered anatomy. Screws through a fusion mass are an alternative to pedicle screw fixation.

Objective: The purpose of this retrospective study was to further elucidate the safety and efficacy of fusion mass screws (FMSs) in revision spinal deformity surgery.

Design: Retrospective case series.

Methods: Fifteen freehand FMSs were placed in 6 patients with adult spinal deformity between 2016 and 2018 by the senior author. FMSs were combined with pedicle screws, at times at the same level. FMSs were used to save distal levels from fusion, assist in closing a 3-column osteotomy and provide additional fixation in cases of severe instability. Computed tomography (CT) was used to assess bone mineral density (BMD) and thickness of each fusion mass preoperatively along with accuracy of FMS placement postoperatively.

Results: The mean BMD of the fusion mass was 397 Hounsfield units (HU; range: 156-628 HU). The mean AP thickness of the fusion mass was 15.5 ± 4.8 mm (range: 8.6-24.4 mm). The mean FMS length was 35.3 ± 5.5 mm (range: 25-40 mm). There was no evidence of FMS loosening, breakage, or pseudarthrosis at latest follow-up (mean: 2.2 years, range: 1.4-3.1 years). No neurologic deficits were observed. 1/15 screws had a low-grade breach into the canal (<2 mm). No patients required revision surgery.

Conclusion: FMSs may be used to augment fixation in revision spinal deformity cases when pedicle screw placement may be challenging. FMSs may also provide an additional anchor at levels with pedicular fixation.

Level Of Evidence: 3:

Citing Articles

Fusion mass to pelvis internal distraction technique using multiple-hook fixation for scoliosis correction: illustrative case.

Sarmiento J, Rymond C, Kozan A, Lenke L J Neurosurg Case Lessons. 2024; 7(11).

PMID: 38467044 PMC: 10936936. DOI: 10.3171/CASE2433.

References

Hu X, Lieberman I . Revision adult spinal deformity surgery: Does the number of previous operations have a negative impact on outcome?. Eur Spine J. 2018; 28(1):155-160. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-018-5747-1. View

Austin M, Vaccaro A, Brislin B, Nachwalter R, Hilibrand A, Albert T . Image-guided spine surgery: a cadaver study comparing conventional open laminoforaminotomy and two image-guided techniques for pedicle screw placement in posterolateral fusion and nonfusion models. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002; 27(22):2503-8. DOI: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000031274.34509.1E. View

Lim M, Girardi F, Yoon S, Huang R, Cammisa Jr F . Accuracy of computerized frameless stereotactic image-guided pedicle screw placement into previously fused lumbar spines. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005; 30(15):1793-8. DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000171905.38459.b7. View

Rampersaud Y, Lee K . Fluoroscopic computer-assisted pedicle screw placement through a mature fusion mass: an assessment of 24 consecutive cases with independent analysis of computed tomography and clinical data. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007; 32(2):217-22. DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000251751.51936.3f. View

Husted D, Yue J, Fairchild T, Haims A . An extrapedicular approach to the placement of screws in the thoracic spine: an anatomic and radiographic assessment. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003; 28(20):2324-30. DOI: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000085361.32600.63. View

Terran J, McHugh B, Fischer C, Lonner B, Warren D, Glassman S . Surgical treatment for adult spinal deformity: projected cost effectiveness at 5-year follow-up. Ochsner J. 2014; 14(1):14-22. PMC: 3962303. View

Yeramaneni S, Robinson C, Hostin R . Impact of spine surgery complications on costs associated with management of adult spinal deformity. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2016; 9(3):327-32. PMC: 4958384. DOI: 10.1007/s12178-016-9352-9. View

Diebo B, Passias P, Marascalchi B, Jalai C, Worley N, Errico T . Primary Versus Revision Surgery in the Setting of Adult Spinal Deformity: A Nationwide Study on 10,912 Patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015; 40(21):1674-80. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001114. View

Aepli M, Mannion A, Grob D . Translaminar screw fixation of the lumbar spine: long-term outcome. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009; 34(14):1492-8. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181a0934f. View

10.

Poorman G, Zhou P, Vasquez-Montes D, Horn S, Bortz C, Segreto F . Differences in primary and revision deformity surgeries: following 1,063 primary thoracolumbar adult spinal deformity fusions over time. J Spine Surg. 2018; 4(2):203-210. PMC: 6046343. DOI: 10.21037/jss.2018.05.06. View

11.

Cho S, Bridwell K, Lenke L, Yi J, Pahys J, P Zebala L . Major complications in revision adult deformity surgery: risk factors and clinical outcomes with 2- to 7-year follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011; 37(6):489-500. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182217ab5. View

12.

Lewis S, Arun R, Bodrogi A, Lebel D, Magana S, Dear T . The use of fusion mass screws in revision spinal deformity surgery. Eur Spine J. 2013; 23 Suppl 2:181-6. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-013-2843-0. View

13.

Liu N, Wood K . Multiple-hook fixation in revision spinal deformity surgery for patients with a previous multilevel fusion mass: technical note and preliminary outcomes. J Neurosurg Spine. 2016; 26(3):368-373. DOI: 10.3171/2016.8.SPINE16432. View

14.

Kim Y, Lenke L, Kim Y, Bridwell K, Kim Y, Watanabe K . Free-hand pedicle screw placement during revision spinal surgery: analysis of 552 screws. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008; 33(10):1141-8. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31816f28a1. View

15.

Lewis S, Canavese F, Keetbaas S . Intralaminar screw insertion of thoracic spine in children with severe spinal deformities: two case reports. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009; 34(7):E251-4. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318194ece1. View

16.

Schreiber J, Anderson P, Rosas H, Buchholz A, Au A . Hounsfield units for assessing bone mineral density and strength: a tool for osteoporosis management. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011; 93(11):1057-63. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.J.00160. View

17.

Hamilton D, Smith J, Sansur C, Glassman S, Ames C, Berven S . Rates of new neurological deficit associated with spine surgery based on 108,419 procedures: a report of the scoliosis research society morbidity and mortality committee. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011; 36(15):1218-28. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181ec5fd9. View

18.

Pitter F, Lindberg-Larsen M, Pedersen A, Dahl B, Gehrchen M . Revision Risk After Primary Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery: A Nationwide Study With Two-Year Follow-up. Spine Deform. 2019; 7(4):619-626.e2. DOI: 10.1016/j.jspd.2018.10.006. View