» Articles » PMID: 35918097

Response to Acute Monotherapy for Major Depressive Disorder in Randomized, Placebo Controlled Trials Submitted to the US Food and Drug Administration: Individual Participant Data Analysis

Overview
Journal BMJ
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2022 Aug 2
PMID 35918097
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: To characterize individual participant level response distributions to acute monotherapy for major depressive disorder in randomized, placebo controlled trials submitted to the US Food and Drug Administration from 1979 to 2016.

Design: Individual participant data analysis.

Population: 232 randomized, double blind, placebo controlled trials of drug monotherapy for major depressive disorder submitted by drug developers to the FDA between 1979 and 2016, comprising 73 388 adult and child participants meeting the inclusion criteria for efficacy studies on antidepressants.

Main Outcome Measures: Responses were converted to Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAMD17) equivalent scores where other measures were used to assess efficacy. Multivariable analyses examined the effects of age, sex, baseline severity, and year of the study on improvements in depressive symptoms in the antidepressant and placebo groups. Response distributions were analyzed with finite mixture models.

Results: The random effects mean difference between drug and placebo favored drug (1.75 points, 95% confidence interval 1.63 to 1.86). Differences between drug and placebo increased significantly (P<0.001) with greater baseline severity. After controlling for participant characteristics at baseline, no trends in treatment effect or placebo response over time were found. The best fitting model of response distributions was three normal distributions, with mean improvements from baseline to end of treatment of 16.0, 8.9, and 1.7 points. These distributions were designated Large, Non-specific, and Minimal responses, respectively. Participants who were treated with a drug were more likely to have a Large response (24.5% 9.6%) and less likely to have a Minimal response (12.2.% 21.5%).

Conclusions: The trimodal response distributions suggests that about 15% of participants have a substantial antidepressant effect beyond a placebo effect in clinical trials, highlighting the need for predictors of meaningful responses specific to drug treatment.

Citing Articles

Pharmacotherapy and psychotherapy in depression - complementarity or exclusion?.

Mosiolek A, Podlecka M Postep Psychiatr Neurol. 2025; 33(1):257-266.

PMID: 40070429 PMC: 11891753. DOI: 10.5114/ppn.2024.147104.


Efficacy of Pharmacological Interventions in Milder Depression: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Urata M, Sakurai H, Ueno F, Maruki T, Tada T, Uchida T Neuropsychopharmacol Rep. 2025; 45(1):e70008.

PMID: 40014460 PMC: 11867163. DOI: 10.1002/npr2.70008.


Comparing apples and oranges in youth depression treatments? A quantitative critique of the evidence base and guidelines.

Stringaris A, Burman C, Delpech R, Uher R, Bhudia D, Miliou D BMJ Ment Health. 2025; 28(1.

PMID: 39832835 PMC: 11752052. DOI: 10.1136/bmjment-2024-301162.


The Role of Awe and Other Psychological Factors in Ketamine's Mechanism of Antidepressant Action.

Ansari M, Sanacora G Biol Psychiatry Glob Open Sci. 2024; 4(5):100353.

PMID: 39713125 PMC: 11662274. DOI: 10.1016/j.bpsgos.2024.100353.


Long-Term Effects of Internet-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy on Depression Prevention Among University Students: Randomized Controlled Factorial Trial.

Nakagami Y, Uwatoko T, Shimamoto T, Sakata M, Toyomoto R, Yoshida K JMIR Ment Health. 2024; 11:e56691.

PMID: 39319584 PMC: 11445681. DOI: 10.2196/56691.


References
1.
Uher R . Genes, environment, and individual differences in responding to treatment for depression. Harv Rev Psychiatry. 2011; 19(3):109-24. DOI: 10.3109/10673229.2011.586551. View

2.
Watanabe N, Omori I, Nakagawa A, Cipriani A, Barbui C, Churchill R . Mirtazapine versus other antidepressive agents for depression. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011; (12):CD006528. PMC: 4158430. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006528.pub2. View

3.
Cipriani A, Koesters M, Furukawa T, Nose M, Purgato M, Omori I . Duloxetine versus other anti-depressive agents for depression. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012; 10:CD006533. PMC: 4169791. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006533.pub2. View

4.
Evers A, Colloca L, Blease C, Annoni M, Atlas L, Benedetti F . Implications of Placebo and Nocebo Effects for Clinical Practice: Expert Consensus. Psychother Psychosom. 2018; 87(4):204-210. PMC: 6191882. DOI: 10.1159/000490354. View

5.
Furukawa T, Maruo K, Noma H, Tanaka S, Imai H, Shinohara K . Initial severity of major depression and efficacy of new generation antidepressants: individual participant data meta-analysis. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2018; 137(6):450-458. DOI: 10.1111/acps.12886. View