» Articles » PMID: 35915342

Social Capital I: Measurement and Associations with Economic Mobility

Abstract

Social capital-the strength of an individual's social network and community-has been identified as a potential determinant of outcomes ranging from education to health. However, efforts to understand what types of social capital matter for these outcomes have been hindered by a lack of social network data. Here, in the first of a pair of papers, we use data on 21 billion friendships from Facebook to study social capital. We measure and analyse three types of social capital by ZIP (postal) code in the United States: (1) connectedness between different types of people, such as those with low versus high socioeconomic status (SES); (2) social cohesion, such as the extent of cliques in friendship networks; and (3) civic engagement, such as rates of volunteering. These measures vary substantially across areas, but are not highly correlated with each other. We demonstrate the importance of distinguishing these forms of social capital by analysing their associations with economic mobility across areas. The share of high-SES friends among individuals with low SES-which we term economic connectedness-is among the strongest predictors of upward income mobility identified to date. Other social capital measures are not strongly associated with economic mobility. If children with low-SES parents were to grow up in counties with economic connectedness comparable to that of the average child with high-SES parents, their incomes in adulthood would increase by 20% on average. Differences in economic connectedness can explain well-known relationships between upward income mobility and racial segregation, poverty rates, and inequality. To support further research and policy interventions, we publicly release privacy-protected statistics on social capital by ZIP code at https://www.socialcapital.org .

Citing Articles

Peer income exposure across the income distribution.

Spiegel M, Clark L, Domina T, Penner E, Hanselman P, Yoo P Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025; 122(7):e2410349122.

PMID: 39937866 PMC: 11848314. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2410349122.


Big cities fuel inequality within and across generations.

Connor D, Xie S, Jang J, Frazier A, Kedron P, Jain G PNAS Nexus. 2025; 4(2):pgae587.

PMID: 39906309 PMC: 11792075. DOI: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae587.


Spreading dynamics of information on online social networks.

Meng F, Xie J, Sun J, Xu C, Zeng Y, Wang X Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025; 122(4):e2410227122.

PMID: 39847317 PMC: 11789049. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2410227122.


Economic inequality, intergenerational mobility, and life expectancy.

Xiong N, Wei Y Soc Sci Med. 2025; 366:117682.

PMID: 39827686 PMC: 11821436. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.117682.


Biopsychosocial factors associated with physical activity among Resettlers of the former Soviet Union in Germany: a cross-sectional analysis.

Ouma M, Juma K, Meisinger C, Stolpe S, Becher H, Winkler V BMJ Open. 2024; 14(12):e086042.

PMID: 39653577 PMC: 11628956. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-086042.


References
1.
Eagle N, Macy M, Claxton R . Network diversity and economic development. Science. 2010; 328(5981):1029-31. DOI: 10.1126/science.1186605. View

2.
Aral S, Nicolaides C . Exercise contagion in a global social network. Nat Commun. 2017; 8:14753. PMC: 5399289. DOI: 10.1038/ncomms14753. View

3.
Hedefalk F, Dribe M . The social context of nearest neighbors shapes educational attainment regardless of class origin. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020; 117(26):14918-14925. PMC: 7334467. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1922532117. View

4.
Manduca R, Sampson R . Punishing and toxic neighborhood environments independently predict the intergenerational social mobility of black and white children. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019; 116(16):7772-7777. PMC: 6475375. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1820464116. View

5.
Wang Q, Phillips N, Small M, Sampson R . Urban mobility and neighborhood isolation in America's 50 largest cities. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018; 115(30):7735-7740. PMC: 6065036. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1802537115. View