» Articles » PMID: 35911890

Adjunctive Treatment With Eslicarbazepine Acetate for Adults and Children With Focal-Onset Epilepsy: A Meta-Analysis

Overview
Journal Front Neurol
Specialty Neurology
Date 2022 Aug 1
PMID 35911890
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The efficacy and tolerability of eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL) in adults and children with focal-onset epilepsy (FOE) according to the dose remain to be validated. A meta-analysis based on randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was therefore conducted as a summary.

Methods: Relevant RCTs were collected by systematic searching the electronic databases of PubMed, Cochrane's Library, Embase, Wanfang and CNKI from inception to May 16, 2022. The random-effect model was adopted to pool the results by incorporating the possible heterogeneity. Efficacy outcomes including responsive rate and effective rate, defined as cases with 50 and ≥75% reduction in seizure frequency compared to baseline, were determined, respectively. Incidence of severe adverse events (AE) leading to drug discontinuation was also evaluated.

Results: Ten studies including 2,565 people with epilepsy contributed to the meta-analysis. For adults, ESL 400 mg/d did not improve the response rate or the effective rate; ESL 800 mg/d was associated with improved response rate (odds ratio [OR] 2.16, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.65-2.83, < 0.001) and effective rate (OR 2.16, 95% CI: 1.41-3.30, < 0.001) without significantly increased severe AE (OR 1.58, 95% CI: 0.90-2.78, = 0.11); ESL 1,200 mg/d improved response rate (OR 2.49, < 0.001) and effective rate (OR 3.09, = 0.04), but significantly increased severe AE (OR 3.72, < 0.001). For children, ESL also did not significantly improve the response rate (OR 1.76, = 0.22) or the effective rate (OR 2.17, = 0.13).

Conclusion: ESL 800 mg/d is effective and well-tolerated as adjuvants for adults with FOE. Efficacy of ESL in children with FOE should be further evaluated.

Citing Articles

The Initial Experience of Eslicarbazepine in Children at Three Canadian Tertiary Pediatric Care Centers.

Nyakeri Y, Xu Q, Nouri M, Haile D, Datta A J Child Neurol. 2024; 40(1):39-48.

PMID: 39376092 PMC: 11590393. DOI: 10.1177/08830738241282903.

References
1.
Thieffry S, Klein P, Baulac M, Plumb J, Pelgrims B, Steeves S . Understanding the challenge of comparative effectiveness research in focal epilepsy: A review of network meta-analyses and real-world evidence on antiepileptic drugs. Epilepsia. 2020; 61(4):595-609. PMC: 7216985. DOI: 10.1111/epi.16476. View

2.
Costa R, Steinhoff B, Gama H, Ikedo F, Rocha J, Soares-da-Silva P . Safety, Tolerability and Efficacy of Eslicarbazepine Acetate as Adjunctive Therapy in Patients Aged ≥ 65 Years with Focal Seizures. Drugs Aging. 2018; 35(12):1109-1117. PMC: 6267536. DOI: 10.1007/s40266-018-0602-y. View

3.
Rashid H, Upadhyay A, Pandey R, Katyal J . Point prevalence of depression in persons with active epilepsy and impact of methodological moderators: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Epilepsy Behav. 2021; 125:108394. DOI: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2021.108394. View

4.
Ben-Menachem E, Gabbai A, Hufnagel A, Maia J, Almeida L, Soares-da-Silva P . Eslicarbazepine acetate as adjunctive therapy in adult patients with partial epilepsy. Epilepsy Res. 2010; 89(2-3):278-85. DOI: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2010.01.014. View

5.
Fisher R, Cross J, French J, Higurashi N, Hirsch E, Jansen F . Operational classification of seizure types by the International League Against Epilepsy: Position Paper of the ILAE Commission for Classification and Terminology. Epilepsia. 2017; 58(4):522-530. DOI: 10.1111/epi.13670. View