» Articles » PMID: 35909379

Management and Outcomes of Femoral Periprosthetic Fractures at the Hip : Data from the Characteristics, Outcomes and Management of Periprosthetic Fracture Service Evaluation (COMPOSE) Cohort Study

Overview
Journal Bone Joint J
Date 2022 Aug 1
PMID 35909379
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aims: The aim of this study was to describe the management and associated outcomes of patients sustaining a femoral hip periprosthetic fracture (PPF) in the UK population.

Methods: This was a multicentre retrospective cohort study including adult patients who presented to 27 NHS hospitals with 539 new PPFs between 1 January 2018 and 31 December 2018. Data collected included: management strategy (operative and nonoperative), length of stay, discharge destination, and details of post-treatment outcomes (reoperation, readmission, and 30-day and 12-month mortality). Descriptive analysis by fracture type was performed, and predictors of PPF management and outcomes were assessed using mixed-effects logistic regression.

Results: In all, 417 fractures (77%) were managed operatively and 122 (23%) conservatively. The median time to surgery was four days (interquartile range (IQR) 2 to 7). Of those undergoing surgery, 246 (59%) underwent revision and/or fixation and 169 (41%) fixation alone. The surgical strategy used differed by Unified Classification System for PPF type, with the highest rate of revision in B2/B3 fractures (both 77%, 176/228 and 24/31, respectively) and the highest rate of fixation alone in B1- (55/78; 71%) and C-type (49/65; 75%) fractures. Cemented stem fixation (odds ratio (OR) 2.66 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.42 to 4.99); p = 0.002) and B2/B3 fracture type (OR 7.56 (95% CI 4.14 to 13.78); p < 0.001) were predictors of operative management. The median length of stay was 15 days (IQR 9 to 23), 12-month reoperation rate was 5.6% (n = 30), and 30-day readmission rate was 8.4% (n = 45). The 30-day and 12-month mortality rates were 5.2% (n = 28) and 21.0% (n = 113). Nonoperative treatment, older age, male sex, admission from residential or nursing care, and sustaining the PPF around a revision prosthesis were significant predictors of an increased 12-month mortality.

Conclusion: Femoral hip PPFs have mortality, reoperation, and readmission rates comparable with hip fracture patients. However, they have a longer wait for surgery, and surgical treatment is more complex. There is a need to create a national framework for data collection for this heterogeneous group of patients in order to understand the outcomes of different approaches to treatment. Cite this article:  2022;104-B(8):997-1008 .

Citing Articles

[Surgical treatment strategies for periprosthetic femoral fractures of type Vancouver B].

Ries C, Gerhardt P, Helwig P, Bathis H, Kirschner S, Rolvien T Orthopadie (Heidelb). 2025; 54(3):205-217.

PMID: 39966160 PMC: 11868169. DOI: 10.1007/s00132-025-04613-y.


The History of Classification Systems for Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures: A Literature Review.

Yao Z, Fan S, Wei-Qiang Zhao , Huang J Orthop Surg. 2024; 16(8):1816-1831.

PMID: 38946014 PMC: 11293929. DOI: 10.1111/os.14149.


Optimizing periprosthetic fracture management and in-hospital outcome: insights from the PIPPAS multicentric study of 1387 cases in Spain.

J Orthop Traumatol. 2024; 25(1):13.

PMID: 38451303 PMC: 10920552. DOI: 10.1186/s10195-024-00746-6.


Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Hip Revision Surgery and Cerclage Wires Fixation for Vancouver B2 and B3 Fractures: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Di Matteo V, La Camera F, Carfi C, Morenghi E, Grappiolo G, Loppini M J Clin Med. 2024; 13(3).

PMID: 38337586 PMC: 10856565. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13030892.


Characteristics and risk factors of UCS fracture subtypes in periprosthetic fractures around the hip.

Nasser A, Osman K, Chauhan G, Prakash R, Handford C, Nandra R Bone Jt Open. 2023; 4(9):659-667.

PMID: 37654129 PMC: 10471444. DOI: 10.1302/2633-1462.49.BJO-2023-0065.R1.