» Articles » PMID: 35908659

Effect of Pulmonary Rehabilitation Approaches on Dyspnea, Exercise Capacity, Fatigue, Lung Functions, and Quality of Life in Patients With COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Overview
Date 2022 Jul 31
PMID 35908659
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To qualitatively synthesize and quantitatively evaluate the effect of pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) on dyspnea, lung functions, fatigue, exercise capacity, and quality of life (QoL) in patients with COVID-19.

Data Sources: PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases were searched from January 2020 to April 2022.

Data Selection: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the effect of PR on dyspnea, lung functions, fatigue, exercise capacity, and QoL in patients with COVID-19.

Data Extraction: The mean difference (MD) and a 95% CI were estimated for all the outcome measures using random effect models. The following data were extracted by 2 independent reviewers: (1) first author; (2) publication year; (3) nationality; (4) number of patients included (5) comorbidities; (6) ventilatory support; (7) length of inpatient stay; (8) type of PR; (9) outcome measures; and (10) main findings. The risk of bias was evaluated using the cochrane risk of bias tool.

Data Synthesis: A total of 8 RCTs involving 449 participants were included in the review. PR was found to be significantly effective in improving dyspnea (5 studies, SMD -2.11 [95% CI, -2.96 to -1.27; P<.001]) and exercise capacity (MD 65.85 m [95% CI, 42.86 to 88.83; P<.001]) in patients with both acute and chronic COVID-19 with mild to severe symptoms, whereas fatigue (MD -2.42 [95% CI, -2.72 to -2.11, P<.05]) and lung functions (MD 0.26 L [95% CI, 0.04 to 0.48, P<.05]) were significantly improved in acute COVID-19 patients with mild symptoms. The effect of PR on QoL was inconsistent across studies. PR was found to be safe and feasible for patients with COVID-19.

Conclusion: Evidence from studies indicates that PR program is superior to no intervention in improving dyspnea, exercise capacity, lung functions, and fatigue in patients with COVID-19. PR appears to be safe and beneficial for both acute and chronic COVID-19 patients.

Citing Articles

Exploratory Analysis of Unstable Surface Training: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis for Chronic Ankle Instability.

Liu S, Gou B, Zhao Z, Wang Q Arch Rehabil Res Clin Transl. 2025; 6(4):100365.

PMID: 39822207 PMC: 11734016. DOI: 10.1016/j.arrct.2024.100365.


The effects of a home telerehabilitation-based program on the cardiopulmonary function and quality of life in post-COVID-19 patients.

Semphuet T, Jianramas N, Nissapatorn V, Sivakorn C, Pereira M, Ratnarathon A Heliyon. 2024; 10(22):e40453.

PMID: 39634416 PMC: 11615492. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e40453.


A Narrative Review of Impact of Incentive Spirometer Respiratory Training in Long COVID.

Chen Y, Hsieh Y Int J Gen Med. 2024; 17:5233-5246.

PMID: 39559556 PMC: 11570525. DOI: 10.2147/IJGM.S492772.


Effects of a cardiopulmonary rehabilitation programme on submaximal exercise in Tunisian patients with long-COVID19: A randomized clinical trial.

Kaddoussi R, Rejeb H, Kalai A, Zaara E, Rouetbi N, Frih Z Biol Sport. 2024; 41(4):197-217.

PMID: 39416495 PMC: 11474993. DOI: 10.5114/biolsport.2024.139072.


Effects of scapulothoracic exercises on chest mobility, respiratory muscle strength, and pulmonary function in male COPD patients with forward shoulder posture: A randomized controlled trial.

Thongchote K, Chinwaro U, Lapmanee S F1000Res. 2024; 11:1284.

PMID: 39281331 PMC: 11393525. DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.126832.2.


References
1.
Wu Z, McGoogan J . Characteristics of and Important Lessons From the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Outbreak in China: Summary of a Report of 72 314 Cases From the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention. JAMA. 2020; 323(13):1239-1242. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2020.2648. View

2.
Curci C, Negrini F, Ferrillo M, Bergonzi R, Bonacci E, Camozzi D . Functional outcome after inpatient rehabilitation in postintensive care unit COVID-19 patients: findings and clinical implications from a real-practice retrospective study. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2021; 57(3):443-450. DOI: 10.23736/S1973-9087.20.06660-5. View

3.
Wan X, Wang W, Liu J, Tong T . Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from the sample size, median, range and/or interquartile range. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014; 14:135. PMC: 4383202. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2288-14-135. View

4.
Sanchez-Ramirez D, Normand K, Zhaoyun Y, Torres-Castro R . Long-Term Impact of COVID-19: A Systematic Review of the Literature and Meta-Analysis. Biomedicines. 2021; 9(8). PMC: 8389585. DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines9080900. View

5.
Gloeckl R, Leitl D, Jarosch I, Schneeberger T, Nell C, Stenzel N . Benefits of pulmonary rehabilitation in COVID-19: a prospective observational cohort study. ERJ Open Res. 2021; 7(2). PMC: 7957293. DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00108-2021. View