» Articles » PMID: 35908068

Comparing Western (Megascops Kennicottii) and Whiskered (M. Trichopsis) Screech-owl Microbiomes in Southern Arizona Using a Novel 16S RRNA Sequencing Method

Overview
Journal Anim Microbiome
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2022 Jul 30
PMID 35908068
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Microbiomes are essential to a host's physiology and health. Despite the overall importance of microbiomes to animal health, they remain understudied in wildlife. Microbiomes function as physical barriers to invading pathogens, and changes in the diversity or composition of microbes within a host may disrupt this barrier. In order to use microbiomes in wildlife ecology, knowledge of the natural variation within and among species is essential. We compare the diversity and composition of two avian species that share the same habitat and niche in our study area, the western screech-owl (Megascops kennicottii) and the whiskered screech-owl (M. trichopsis). We used a targeted 16S sequencing method to improve the taxonomic resolution of microbiomes. We found similar measures of alpha diversity between species and sample types (cloacal samples vs. fecal samples). However, there were significant differences in bacterial species richness among nestlings from different nest boxes, and the composition differed between the two bird species and among nestlings from different nest boxes. Western screech-owls had more variation in alpha diversity and composition and had fewer bacterial species in their core microbiome than whiskered screech-owls. Siblings are likely to yield similar findings for microbiomes; thus, sampling nestlings from different nests may be most informative for monitoring population-level changes.

Citing Articles

The Bacterial and pathogenic landscape of African buffalo (Syncerus caffer) whole blood and serum from Kenya.

Nyamota R, Middlebrook E, M Abkallo H, Akoko J, Gakuya F, Wambua L Anim Microbiome. 2025; 7(1):6.

PMID: 39800778 PMC: 11725222. DOI: 10.1186/s42523-024-00374-9.


Stopover habitat selection drives variation in the gut microbiome composition and pathogen acquisition by migrating shorebirds.

Wlodarczyk R, Drzewinska-Chanko J, Kaminski M, Meissner W, Rapczynski J, Janik-Superson K FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2024; 100(5).

PMID: 38515294 PMC: 11008731. DOI: 10.1093/femsec/fiae040.


Habitat shapes the gut microbiome diversity of Malayan tigers (Panthera tigris jacksoni) as revealed through metabarcoding 16S rRNA profiling.

Gani M, Mohd-Ridwan A, Sitam F, Kamarudin Z, Selamat S, Awang N World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2024; 40(4):111.

PMID: 38416247 DOI: 10.1007/s11274-023-03868-x.

References
1.
Liu C, Finegold S, Song Y, Lawson P . Reclassification of Clostridium coccoides, Ruminococcus hansenii, Ruminococcus hydrogenotrophicus, Ruminococcus luti, Ruminococcus productus and Ruminococcus schinkii as Blautia coccoides gen. nov., comb. nov., Blautia hansenii comb. nov., Blautia.... Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2008; 58(Pt 8):1896-902. DOI: 10.1099/ijs.0.65208-0. View

2.
Knutie S, Chaves J, Gotanda K . Human activity can influence the gut microbiota of Darwin's finches in the Galapagos Islands. Mol Ecol. 2019; 28(9):2441-2450. DOI: 10.1111/mec.15088. View

3.
McMurdie P, Holmes S . phyloseq: an R package for reproducible interactive analysis and graphics of microbiome census data. PLoS One. 2013; 8(4):e61217. PMC: 3632530. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0061217. View

4.
Ellis J, Missan D, Shabilla M, Martinez D, Fry S . Rapid infectious disease identification by next-generation DNA sequencing. J Microbiol Methods. 2016; 138:12-19. DOI: 10.1016/j.mimet.2016.09.012. View

5.
Huse S, Welch D, Morrison H, Sogin M . Ironing out the wrinkles in the rare biosphere through improved OTU clustering. Environ Microbiol. 2010; 12(7):1889-98. PMC: 2909393. DOI: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2010.02193.x. View