» Articles » PMID: 35906409

Prevalence and Predictors of Difficult Vascular Anatomy in Forearm Artery Access for Coronary Angiography and PCI

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2022 Jul 29
PMID 35906409
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Transradial access has established as preferred access for cardiac catheterization. Difficult vascular anatomy (DVA) is a noticeable threat to procedural success. We retrospectively analyzed 1397 consecutive cardiac catheterizations to estimate prevalence and identify predictors of DVA. In the subclavian-innominate-aortic-region (SIAR), DVA was causing failure in 2.4% during right-sided vs. 0.7% in left-sided forearm-artery-access (FAA) attempts (χ = 5.1, p = 0.023). Independent predictors were advanced age [odds ratio (OR) 1.44 per 10-year increase, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.15 to 1.80, p = 0.001] and right FAA (OR 2.52, 95% CI 1.72 to 3.69, p < 0.001). In the radial-ulnar-brachial region (RUBR), DVA was causing failure in 2.5% during right-sided vs. 1.7% in left-sided FAA (χ = 0.77, p = 0.38). Independent predictors were age (OR 1.28 per 10-year increase, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.61, p = 0.04), lower height (OR 1.56 per 10-cm decrease, 95% CI 1.13 to 2.15, p = 0.008) and left FAA (OR 2.15, 95% CI 1.45 to 3.18, p < 0.001). Bilateral DVA was causing procedural failure in 0.9% of patients. The prevalence of bilateral DVA was rare. Predictors in SIAR were right FAA and advanced age and in RUBR, left FAA, advanced age and lower height. Gender, arterial hypertension, body mass, STEMI and smoking were not associated with DVA.

Citing Articles

Lower Patient Height and Weight Are Predisposing Factors for Complex Radial Arterial Catheterization.

Huber K, Menzenbach J, Velten M, Kim S, Hilbert T J Clin Med. 2023; 12(6).

PMID: 36983225 PMC: 10056435. DOI: 10.3390/jcm12062225.

References
1.
Pristipino C, Pelliccia F, Granatelli A, Pasceri V, Roncella A, Speciale G . Comparison of access-related bleeding complications in women versus men undergoing percutaneous coronary catheterization using the radial versus femoral artery. Am J Cardiol. 2007; 99(9):1216-21. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2006.12.038. View

2.
Dehghani P, Mohammad A, Bajaj R, Hong T, Suen C, Sharieff W . Mechanism and predictors of failed transradial approach for percutaneous coronary interventions. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2009; 2(11):1057-64. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2009.07.014. View

3.
Rigatelli G, DellAvvocata F, Vassiliev D, Daggubati R, Nanjiundappa A, Giordan M . Strategies to overcome hostile subclavian anatomy during transradial coronary angiography and interventions: impact on fluoroscopy, procedural time, complications, and radial patency. J Interv Cardiol. 2014; 27(4):428-34. DOI: 10.1111/joic.12127. View

4.
Norgaz T, Gorgulu S, Dagdelen S . Arterial anatomic variations and its influence on transradial coronary procedural outcome. J Interv Cardiol. 2012; 25(4):418-24. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8183.2012.00693.x. View

5.
Cha K, Kim M, Kim H . Prevalence and clinical predictors of severe tortuosity of right subclavian artery in patients undergoing transradial coronary angiography. Am J Cardiol. 2003; 92(10):1220-2. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2003.07.038. View