Most Plant-based Meat Alternative Buyers Also Buy Meat: an Analysis of Household Demographics, Habit Formation, and Buying Behavior Among Meat Alternative Buyers

Overview

Journal Sci Rep

Specialty Science

Date 2022 Jul 29

PMID 35906384

Authors

Zachary T Neuhofer

Jayson L Lusk

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

The promise of novel plant-based meat alternatives (PBMAs) to lessen the health and environmental impacts of meat consumption ultimately depend on market acceptance and the extent to which they displace meat in consumers' diets. We use household scanner data to provide an in-depth analysis of consumers' PBMA buying behaviors. PBMAs buyers tend to be young, single, female, college educated, employed, higher income, and non-white. About 20% of consumers purchased a PBMA at least once, and 12% purchased a PBMA on multiple occasions. About 2.79% of households only purchased PBMAs. About 86% of PBMA buyers also bought ground meat; however, PBMA buyers spent about 13% less on ground meat. Interestingly, after a household's first PBMA purchase, ground meat consumption did not fall. The number of households buying a PBMA for the first time fell over the two year period studied, despite the increase in market share in the ground meat market.

Citing Articles

Differences in the Physical Properties of Plant-Based Meat Alternatives Containing Root Vegetables.

Kim S, Lee D, Lee J, Park S, Choi S, Choi Y Foods. 2024; 13(23).

PMID: 39682818 PMC: 11640789. DOI: 10.3390/foods13233746.

Substitution patterns and price response for plant-based meat alternatives.

Jahn S, Guhl D, Erhard A Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024; 121(50):e2319016121.

PMID: 39621919 PMC: 11648651. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2319016121.

Market Status of Meat Analogs and Their Impact on Livestock Industries.

Lee D, Venter C, Choi Y, Park J, Han D, Kim J Food Sci Anim Resour. 2024; 44(6):1213-1251.

PMID: 39554824 PMC: 11564142. DOI: 10.5851/kosfa.2024.e77.

Exploring Consumer Preferences and Challenges in Hybrid Meat Products: A Conjoint Analysis of Hotdogs.

Salgaonkar K, Nolden A Foods. 2024; 13(10).

PMID: 38790760 PMC: 11120016. DOI: 10.3390/foods13101460.

Microbial community structure of plant-based meat alternatives.

Roch F, Dzieciol M, Quijada N, Alteio L, Mester P, Selberherr E NPJ Sci Food. 2024; 8(1):27.

PMID: 38740858 PMC: 11091099. DOI: 10.1038/s41538-024-00269-8.

References

Clark M, Springmann M, Hill J, Tilman D . Multiple health and environmental impacts of foods. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019; 116(46):23357-23362. PMC: 6859310. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1906908116. View

Zhao S, Wang L, Hu W, Zheng Y . Meet the Meatless: Demand for New Generation Plant-Based Meat Alternatives. Appl Econ Perspect Policy. 2023; 45(1):4-21. PMC: 10022684. DOI: 10.1002/aepp.13232. View

Eshel G, Shepon A, Makov T, Milo R . Land, irrigation water, greenhouse gas, and reactive nitrogen burdens of meat, eggs, and dairy production in the United States. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014; 111(33):11996-2001. PMC: 4143028. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1402183111. View

Toh D, Srv A, Henry C . Unknown impacts of plant-based meat alternatives on long-term health. Nat Food. 2023; 3(2):90-91. DOI: 10.1038/s43016-022-00463-5. View

Onwezen M, Bouwman E, Reinders M, Dagevos H . A systematic review on consumer acceptance of alternative proteins: Pulses, algae, insects, plant-based meat alternatives, and cultured meat. Appetite. 2020; 159:105058. DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2020.105058. View

Rubio N, Xiang N, Kaplan D . Plant-based and cell-based approaches to meat production. Nat Commun. 2020; 11(1):6276. PMC: 7722853. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-20061-y. View

Zheng Y, Li Y, Satija A, Pan A, Sotos-Prieto M, Rimm E . Association of changes in red meat consumption with total and cause specific mortality among US women and men: two prospective cohort studies. BMJ. 2019; 365:l2110. PMC: 6559336. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.l2110. View

Mazac R, Meinila J, Korkalo L, Jarvio N, Jalava M, Tuomisto H . Incorporation of novel foods in European diets can reduce global warming potential, water use and land use by over 80. Nat Food. 2023; 3(4):286-293. DOI: 10.1038/s43016-022-00489-9. View

Heller M, Willits-Smith A, Meyer R, Keoleian G, Rose D . Greenhouse gas emissions and energy use associated with production of individual self-selected US diets. Environ Res Lett. 2018; 13(4):044004. PMC: 5964346. DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/aab0ac. View

10.

Hu F, Otis B, McCarthy G . Can Plant-Based Meat Alternatives Be Part of a Healthy and Sustainable Diet?. JAMA. 2019; 322(16):1547-1548. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2019.13187. View

11.

Sun Z, Scherer L, Tukker A, Spawn-Lee S, Bruckner M, Gibbs H . Dietary change in high-income nations alone can lead to substantial double climate dividend. Nat Food. 2023; 3(1):29-37. DOI: 10.1038/s43016-021-00431-5. View

12.

Springmann M, Godfray H, Rayner M, Scarborough P . Analysis and valuation of the health and climate change cobenefits of dietary change. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016; 113(15):4146-51. PMC: 4839446. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1523119113. View

13.

Sanchez-Sabate R, Sabate J . Consumer Attitudes Towards Environmental Concerns of Meat Consumption: A Systematic Review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019; 16(7). PMC: 6479556. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16071220. View

14.

Godfray H, Aveyard P, Garnett T, Hall J, Key T, Lorimer J . Meat consumption, health, and the environment. Science. 2018; 361(6399). DOI: 10.1126/science.aam5324. View

15.

Tuninetti M, Ridolfi L, Laio F . Compliance with EAT-Lancet dietary guidelines would reduce global water footprint but increase it for 40% of the world population. Nat Food. 2023; 3(2):143-151. DOI: 10.1038/s43016-021-00452-0. View

16.

Slade P . If you build it, will they eat it? Consumer preferences for plant-based and cultured meat burgers. Appetite. 2018; 125:428-437. DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2018.02.030. View