» Articles » PMID: 35901330

Salvage Treatment and Outcomes of Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer After Failed Concurrent Chemoradiation with or Without Adjuvant Chemotherapy: Post Hoc Data Analysis from the ACTLACC Trial

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the type of salvage treatment and outcomes of patients with locally advanced cervical cancer who failed treatment with concurrent chemoradiation with or without adjuvant chemotherapy.

Methods: This was post hoc analyses of data from the randomized trial which included 259 patients who had FIGO stage IIB-IVA and had either pelvic radiation therapy concurrent with cisplatin followed by observation or paclitaxel plus carboplatin. Data of the patients who failed primary treatment were collected: type of salvage treatments, time to progress after salvage therapy, progression-free (PFS) and overall survivals (OS).

Results: After primary treatment, 85 patients had either persistence (36.5%), progression (18.8%), or recurrences (44.7%). The sites of failure were loco/regional in 52.9%, systemic failure in 30.6%, and loco-regional and systemic in 16.5%. Chemotherapy was given in 51.8%, being the sole therapy in 34.1%. Majority were combination agents (31.8%), with paclitaxel/carboplatin as the most common regimen. Radiation to the metastatic sites along with chemotherapy was used in 14.1% whereas palliative radiation therapy or supportive care was used in approximately 10% of each. The median time from the start of salvage treatment to progression was 9.2 months (range 0.2-64.0 months) with median PFS of 11.2 months (95% CI, 7.2-15.3 months). Median overall survival 27.3 months (95% CI, 4.4-69.6 months).

Conclusions: Chemotherapy, either alone or with radiation therapy, was the most common salvage treatment in LACC after failure from primary treatment. The time to progress and PFS were less than 1 year with OS of approximately 2 years.

Citing Articles

Clinical analysis of decision implementation by a multidisciplinary team in cervical cancer cases in Ganzhou, China.

Huang J, Zeng X, Chen H, Luo D, Li R, Wu X Front Oncol. 2023; 13:1160626.

PMID: 37664056 PMC: 10470119. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1160626.


A Retrospective Study of Chemotherapy and 3D-Image-Guided Afterloading Intracavitary Radiotherapy in Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer.

Li X, An C, Feng C, Sun J, Lu H, Yang X J Oncol. 2022; 2022:9578436.

PMID: 36213841 PMC: 9546676. DOI: 10.1155/2022/9578436.

References
1.
Moore D, Tian C, Monk B, Long H, Omura G, Bloss J . Prognostic factors for response to cisplatin-based chemotherapy in advanced cervical carcinoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. Gynecol Oncol. 2009; 116(1):44-9. PMC: 4470610. DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2009.09.006. View

2.
. Reducing uncertainties about the effects of chemoradiotherapy for cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data from 18 randomized trials. J Clin Oncol. 2008; 26(35):5802-12. PMC: 2645100. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2008.16.4368. View

3.
Duenas-Gonzalez A, Zarba J, Patel F, Alcedo J, Beslija S, Casanova L . Phase III, open-label, randomized study comparing concurrent gemcitabine plus cisplatin and radiation followed by adjuvant gemcitabine and cisplatin versus concurrent cisplatin and radiation in patients with stage IIB to IVA carcinoma of the cervix. J Clin Oncol. 2011; 29(13):1678-85. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2009.25.9663. View

4.
Murray L, Lilley J, Hawkins M, Henry A, Dickinson P, Sebag-Montefiore D . Pelvic re-irradiation using stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR): A systematic review. Radiother Oncol. 2017; 125(2):213-222. DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2017.09.030. View

5.
Tang J, Tang Y, Yang J, Huang S . Chemoradiation and adjuvant chemotherapy in advanced cervical adenocarcinoma. Gynecol Oncol. 2012; 125(2):297-302. DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.01.033. View