Estimation of Head Accelerations in Crashes Using Neural Networks and Sensors Embedded in the Protective Helmet

Overview

Journal Sensors (Basel)

Publisher MDPI

Specialty Biotechnology

Date 2022 Jul 28

PMID 35898094

Authors

Andrea Bracali

Niccolo Baldanzini

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Traumatic Brain Injuries (TBIs) are one of the most frequent and severe outcomes of a Powered Two-Wheeler (PTW) crash. Early diagnosis and treatment can greatly reduce permanent consequences. Despite the fact that devices to track head kinematics have been developed for sports applications, they all have limitations, which hamper their use in everyday road applications. In this study, a new technical solution based on accelerometers integrated in a motorcycle helmet is presented, and the related methodology to estimate linear and rotational acceleration of the head with deep Artificial Neural Networks (dANNs) is developed. A finite element model of helmet coupled with a Hybrid III head model was used to generate data needed for the neural network training. Input data to the dANN model were time signals of (virtual) accelerometers placed on the inner surface of the helmet shell, while the output data were the components of linear and rotational head accelerations. The network was capable of estimating, with good accuracy, time patterns of the acceleration components in all impact conditions that require medical treatment. The correlation between the reference and estimated values was high for all parameters and for both linear and rotational acceleration, with coefficients of determination (R2) ranging from 0.91 to 0.97.

References

Rowson S, Beckwith J, Chu J, Leonard D, Greenwald R, Duma S . A six degree of freedom head acceleration measurement device for use in football. J Appl Biomech. 2011; 27(1):8-14. DOI: 10.1123/jab.27.1.8. View

Funk J, Duma S, Manoogian S, Rowson S . Biomechanical risk estimates for mild traumatic brain injury. Annu Proc Assoc Adv Automot Med. 2008; 51:343-61. PMC: 3217524. View

Rowson S, Duma S, Beckwith J, Chu J, Greenwald R, Crisco J . Rotational head kinematics in football impacts: an injury risk function for concussion. Ann Biomed Eng. 2011; 40(1):1-13. PMC: 10465647. DOI: 10.1007/s10439-011-0392-4. View

Hochreiter S, Schmidhuber J . Long short-term memory. Neural Comput. 1997; 9(8):1735-80. DOI: 10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735. View

Crisco J, Wilcox B, Beckwith J, Chu J, Duhaime A, Rowson S . Head impact exposure in collegiate football players. J Biomech. 2011; 44(15):2673-8. PMC: 3189296. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2011.08.003. View

Dirgova Luptakova I, Kubovcik M, Pospichal J . Wearable Sensor-Based Human Activity Recognition with Transformer Model. Sensors (Basel). 2022; 22(5). PMC: 8914677. DOI: 10.3390/s22051911. View

Mahmood M, Visan A, Ristoscu C, Mihailescu I . Artificial Neural Network Algorithms for 3D Printing. Materials (Basel). 2021; 14(1). PMC: 7795953. DOI: 10.3390/ma14010163. View

Crisco J, Chu J, Greenwald R . An algorithm for estimating acceleration magnitude and impact location using multiple nonorthogonal single-axis accelerometers. J Biomech Eng. 2005; 126(6):849-54. DOI: 10.1115/1.1824135. View

Joodaki H, Bailey A, Lessley D, Funk J, Sherwood C, Crandall J . Relative Motion Between the Helmet and the Head in Football Impact Test. J Biomech Eng. 2019; 141(8). DOI: 10.1115/1.4043038. View

10.

Beckwith J, Greenwald R, Chu J . Measuring head kinematics in football: correlation between the head impact telemetry system and Hybrid III headform. Ann Biomed Eng. 2011; 40(1):237-48. PMC: 3248620. DOI: 10.1007/s10439-011-0422-2. View

11.

Ghajari M, Peldschus S, Galvanetto U, Iannucci L . Effects of the presence of the body in helmet oblique impacts. Accid Anal Prev. 2012; 50:263-71. DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2012.04.016. View

12.

Meng S, Cernicchi A, Kleiven S, Halldin P . High-speed helmeted head impacts in motorcycling: A computational study. Accid Anal Prev. 2019; 134:105297. DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2019.105297. View

13.

Zhang L, Yang K, King A . A proposed injury threshold for mild traumatic brain injury. J Biomech Eng. 2004; 126(2):226-36. DOI: 10.1115/1.1691446. View

14.

Daugherty J, Waltzman D, Sarmiento K, Xu L . Traumatic Brain Injury-Related Deaths by Race/Ethnicity, Sex, Intent, and Mechanism of Injury - United States, 2000-2017. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2019; 68(46):1050-1056. PMC: 6871899. DOI: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6846a2. View

15.

Rowson S, Duma S . Brain injury prediction: assessing the combined probability of concussion using linear and rotational head acceleration. Ann Biomed Eng. 2013; 41(5):873-82. PMC: 3624001. DOI: 10.1007/s10439-012-0731-0. View

16.

Tu J . Advantages and disadvantages of using artificial neural networks versus logistic regression for predicting medical outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol. 1996; 49(11):1225-31. DOI: 10.1016/s0895-4356(96)00002-9. View

17.

Dever A, Powell D, Graham L, Mason R, Das J, Marshall S . Gait Impairment in Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Review. Sensors (Basel). 2022; 22(4). PMC: 8875145. DOI: 10.3390/s22041480. View

18.

Margulies S, Thibault L . A proposed tolerance criterion for diffuse axonal injury in man. J Biomech. 1992; 25(8):917-23. DOI: 10.1016/0021-9290(92)90231-o. View

19.

Allison M, Kang Y, Maltese M, Bolte 4th J, Arbogast K . Measurement of Hybrid III Head Impact Kinematics Using an Accelerometer and Gyroscope System in Ice Hockey Helmets. Ann Biomed Eng. 2014; 43(8):1896-906. DOI: 10.1007/s10439-014-1197-z. View

20.

Gabler L, Crandall J, Panzer M . Assessment of Kinematic Brain Injury Metrics for Predicting Strain Responses in Diverse Automotive Impact Conditions. Ann Biomed Eng. 2016; 44(12):3705-3718. DOI: 10.1007/s10439-016-1697-0. View