» Articles » PMID: 35897386

Differences and Influencing Factors of Relative Poverty of Urban and Rural Residents in China Based on the Survey of 31 Provinces and Cities

Overview
Publisher MDPI
Date 2022 Jul 28
PMID 35897386
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

China achieved comprehensive poverty eradication under the current standards in 2020, but eliminating absolute poverty does not mean the end of poverty alleviation and reduction; relative poverty will exist for a long time and has become the subject of poverty study. In this paper, the social poverty line (SPL) index is utilized to establish the relative poverty standard, and CHFS2017 is used to compare the regional distribution of relative poverty in China. The results show that the relative poverty in rural areas is more serious than that in urban areas. The rural relative poverty rate in five provinces and cities including Beijing is over 60%, and the rural relative poverty rate in Qinghai is low. The urban relative poverty rate in many provinces and cities of the central and western regions is below 40%, and the relatively high relative poverty rate in the eastern region has drawn attention to the issue of the income distribution. Moreover, a logit model for binary is employed for the influencing factor analysis of the relative poverty of urban and rural residents. The results show that the education year has a negative effect on the relative poverty of urban and rural residents. Happiness has a positive effect on urban residents, government financial expenditure and financial support for agriculture have different effects on rural residents and urban residents. Therefore, we put forward aiming at relative poverty in the rural areas of the central and western regions to reduce financial pressure and increase the benefits of poverty reduction.

Citing Articles

Under-Five Child Poverty and Income Inequality in South Africa: A Multidimensional Perspective at the Lowest Geographic Areas.

Mathebula J, Alaba O Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025; 22(1.

PMID: 39857459 PMC: 11764501. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph22010006.


Association between sanitary toilets and health poverty vulnerability among rural western Chinese adults aged 45 years and older: A cross-sectional study.

Ma X, Hu Q, He J, Li C, Chen K, Wang W PLoS One. 2024; 19(9):e0308688.

PMID: 39302976 PMC: 11414992. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0308688.


A cross-sectional study on the moderating effect of self-efficacy on the relationship between sociodemographic variables and nutrition literacy among older adults in rural areas of North Sichuan.

Liu S, Fan X, Jiang L, Liu T Front Nutr. 2024; 10:1335008.

PMID: 38260079 PMC: 10800664. DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2023.1335008.


What influence farmers' relative poverty in China: A global analysis based on statistical and interpretable machine learning methods.

Huang W, Liu Y, Hu P, Ding S, Gao S, Zhang M Heliyon. 2023; 9(9):e19525.

PMID: 37809468 PMC: 10558733. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19525.


Pandemics erode poverty alleviation process: Impact on productive livelihood and poverty return.

Wang B, Shi H, Wang Z, Xu S, Deng N, Qiu Y iScience. 2023; :107177.

PMID: 37366395 PMC: 10278892. DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.107177.


References
1.
Boyce C, Brown G, Moore S . Money and happiness: rank of income, not income, affects life satisfaction. Psychol Sci. 2010; 21(4):471-5. DOI: 10.1177/0956797610362671. View

2.
Wang W, Luo X, Zhang C, Song J, Xu D . Can Land Transfer Alleviate the Poverty of the Elderly? Evidence from Rural China. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021; 18(21). PMC: 8582979. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph182111288. View

3.
Zhang Q, Zhang X, Cui Q, Cao W, He L, Zhou Y . The Unequal Effect of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Labour Market and Income Inequality in China: A Multisectoral CGE Model Analysis Coupled with a Micro-Simulation Approach. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19(3). PMC: 8835274. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19031320. View