» Articles » PMID: 35897380

Influences of the Built Environment on Rural School Children's Travel Mode Choice: The Case of Chengdu

Overview
Publisher MDPI
Date 2022 Jul 28
PMID 35897380
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Since the reform and opening up of China, the rural built environment has changed dramatically. There is a need to understand how such changes have impacted rural children's school travel mode choice to design the built environment and plan schools accordingly. This paper combines field measurement methods and questionnaires to obtain data on rural children's school travel behavior and uses the multinomial logit (MNL) model to investigate the impacting factors. The results show the following insights: Age has a significant positive impact on children's choice of bicycles and buses. The improvements in road layout and facility conditions are significantly and positively associated with children's choice of electric bicycles for school. There is a significant positive correlation between a good and safe public environment and children's choice of cycling. Furthermore, distance from home to school has a significant impact on the choice of children's school travel mode: the greater the distance to school, the higher the probability that children will choose motorized modes of travel such as buses and private cars. This study provides empirical data and evidence in designing rural transport systems for school children based on their preferences concerning built environment factors.

Citing Articles

A review of factors influencing sensitive skin: an emphasis on built environment characteristics.

Chen X, Wen J, Wu W, Peng Q, Cui X, He L Front Public Health. 2023; 11:1269314.

PMID: 38111482 PMC: 10726041. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1269314.


The built environment impacts on route choice from home to school for rural students: A stated preference experiment.

Han L, Wang Y, Ao Y, Ding X, Li M, Wang T Front Public Health. 2022; 10:1087467.

PMID: 36568754 PMC: 9768427. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1087467.

References
1.
Ozbil A, Yesiltepe D, Argin G, Rybarczyk G . Children's Active School Travel: Examining the Combined Perceived and Objective Built-Environment Factors from Space Syntax. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021; 18(1). PMC: 7796020. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18010286. View

2.
Ikeda E, Hinckson E, Witten K, Smith M . Assessment of direct and indirect associations between children active school travel and environmental, household and child factors using structural equation modelling. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2019; 16(1):32. PMC: 6451289. DOI: 10.1186/s12966-019-0794-5. View

3.
Larouche R, Mammen G, Rowe D, Faulkner G . Effectiveness of active school transport interventions: a systematic review and update. BMC Public Health. 2018; 18(1):206. PMC: 5796594. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-017-5005-1. View

4.
Guo Y, Yang L, Huang W, Guo Y . Traffic Safety Perception, Attitude, and Feeder Mode Choice of Metro Commute: Evidence from Shenzhen. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020; 17(24). PMC: 7765347. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17249402. View

5.
Mota J, Gomes H, Almeida M, Ribeiro J, Carvalho J, Santos M . Active versus passive transportation to school-differences in screen time, socio-economic position and perceived environmental characteristics in adolescent girls. Ann Hum Biol. 2007; 34(3):273-82. DOI: 10.1080/03014460701308615. View