» Articles » PMID: 35897343

Pinch Grip Per SE Is Not an Occupational Risk Factor for the Musculoskeletal System: An Experimental Study on Field

Overview
Publisher MDPI
Date 2022 Jul 28
PMID 35897343
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Some ergonomic evaluation methods define pinch grip as a risk factor independent of the exerted force. The present experimental study was performed with the main aim of objectively measuring the muscle engagement during the execution of pinch grip.

Methods: the participants of the study were healthy workers occupationally involved in a high-intensity repetitive job related to the sorting of letters and small packages. Surface electromyography (sEMG) was used to study the activity of the abductor pollicis brevis and first dorsal interosseous fibers related to the execution of the required working tasks, while the force exerted during voluntary muscle contraction for pinch grip was measured by a portable acquisition system. The subjects were specifically asked to exert the maximum voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC) and further voluntary isometric contractions with a spontaneous force (SF) equal to 10%,20% and 50% of the MVIC; finally, the workers were asked to hold in pinch grip two types of envelopes, weighing 100 g and 500 g, respectively.

Results: The force required to pinch 100 and 500 g envelopes by the fifteen subjects of the study corresponded to 4 and 5% MVIC, respectively. The corresponding sEMG average rectified values (ARV) were approximately 6% of that at MVIC for first dorsal interosseus (FDI) fibers and approximately 20-25% of MVIC for abductor pollicis brevis (ABP) fibers. Bivariate correlation analysis showed significant relationships between force at MVIC and FDI ARV at MCV.

Conclusions: The obtained results demonstrate that muscle recruitment during pinch grip varies as a function of the SF: not only the position but also the exerted force should be considered when assessing the pinch grip as risk factor for biomechanical overload of the upper limb.

Citing Articles

A Twenty-Year Retrospective Analysis of Risk Assessment of Biomechanical Overload of the Upper Limbs in Multiple Occupational Settings: Comparison of Different Ergonomic Methods.

Sala E, Cipriani L, Bisioli A, Paraggio E, Tomasi C, Apostoli P Bioengineering (Basel). 2023; 10(5).

PMID: 37237650 PMC: 10215930. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering10050580.

References
1.
Wang D, Tang L, Wu H, Gu D . Analysis of the effect of overusing thumbs on smartphone games. J Int Med Res. 2019; 47(12):6244-6253. PMC: 7045664. DOI: 10.1177/0300060519881016. View

2.
Dianat I, Feizi H, Hasan-Khali K . Pinch strengths in healthy Iranian children and young adult population. Health Promot Perspect. 2015; 5(1):52-8. PMC: 4430698. DOI: 10.15171/hpp.2015.007. View

3.
Hales T, Bernard B . Epidemiology of work-related musculoskeletal disorders. Orthop Clin North Am. 1996; 27(4):679-709. View

4.
Lo V, Chiu Y, Tu H, Liu C, Yu C . A Pilot Study of Five Types of Maximum Hand Strength among Manufacturing Industry Workers in Taiwan. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019; 16(23). PMC: 6926616. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16234742. View

5.
Shergill A, Asundi K, Barr A, Shah J, Ryan J, McQuaid K . Pinch force and forearm-muscle load during routine colonoscopy: a pilot study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008; 69(1):142-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.09.030. View