» Articles » PMID: 35897088

The Association Between the Presence of Fast-food Outlets and BMI: the Role of Neighbourhood Socio-economic Status, Healthy Food Outlets, and Dietary Factors

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Public Health
Date 2022 Jul 27
PMID 35897088
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Evidence on the association between the presence of fast-food outlets and Body Mass Index (BMI) is inconsistent. Furthermore, mechanisms underlying the fast-food outlet presence-BMI association are understudied. We investigated the association between the number of fast-food outlets being present and objectively measured BMI. Moreover, we investigated to what extent this association was moderated by neighbourhood socio-economic status (NSES) and healthy food outlets. Additionally, we investigated mediation by frequency of fast-food consumption and amount of fat intake.

Methods: In this cross-sectional study, we used baseline data of adults in Lifelines (N = 149,617). Geo-coded residential addresses were linked to fast-food and healthy food outlet locations. We computed the number of fast-food and healthy food outlets within 1 kilometre (km) of participants' residential addresses (each categorised into null, one, or at least two). Participants underwent objective BMI measurements. We linked data to Statistics Netherlands to compute NSES. Frequency of fast-food consumption and amount of fat intake were measured through questionnaires in Lifelines. Multivariable multilevel linear regression analyses were performed to investigate associations between fast-food outlet presence and BMI, adjusting for individual and environmental potential confounders. When exposure-moderator interactions had p-value < 0.10 or improved model fit (∆AIC ≥ 2), we conducted stratified analyses. We used causal mediation methods to assess mediation.

Results: Participants with one fast-food outlet within 1 km had a higher BMI than participants with no fast-food outlet within 1 km (B = 0.11, 95% CI: 0.01, 0.21). Effect sizes for at least two fast-food outlets were larger in low NSES areas (B = 0.29, 95% CI: 0.01, 0.57), and especially in low NSES areas where at least two healthy food outlets within 1 km were available (B = 0.75, 95% CI: 0.19, 1.31). Amount of fat intake, but not frequency of fast-food consumption, explained this association for 3.1%.

Conclusions: Participants living in low SES neighbourhoods with at least two fast-food outlets within 1 km of their residential address had a higher BMI than their peers with no fast-food outlets within 1 km. Among these participants, healthy food outlets did not buffer the potentially unhealthy impact of fast-food outlets. Amount of fat intake partly explained this association. This study highlights neighbourhood socio-economic inequalities regarding fast-food outlets and BMI.

Citing Articles

Special Diets and Nutrient Intakes in Morbidly Obese US Adults in Comparison to the 2020-2025 Dietary Guidelines for Americans.

Storz M, Stubing F, Huber R Nutr J. 2025; 24(1):37.

PMID: 40057715 PMC: 11889755. DOI: 10.1186/s12937-025-01088-7.


Health impacts of takeaway management zones around schools in six different local authorities across England: a public health modelling study using PRIMEtime.

Rogers N, Amies-Cull B, Adams J, Chang M, Cummins S, Derbyshire D BMC Med. 2024; 22(1):545.

PMID: 39563350 PMC: 11575031. DOI: 10.1186/s12916-024-03739-8.


Applying systems thinking in youth-centred participatory action research for health promotion in an underserved neighbourhood.

Emke H, Altenburg T, Dijkstra C, Luna Pinzon A, Stronks K, Waterlander W Front Public Health. 2024; 12:1272663.

PMID: 38887247 PMC: 11180748. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1272663.


Trapped in vicious cycles: unraveling the health experiences and needs of adults living with socioeconomic insecurity.

Verra S, Poelman M, Mudd A, de Wit J, Kamphuis C Arch Public Health. 2024; 82(1):51.

PMID: 38627821 PMC: 11020895. DOI: 10.1186/s13690-024-01281-w.


Effects of changes in residential fast-food outlet exposure on Body Mass Index change: longitudinal evidence from 92,211 Lifelines participants.

van Erpecum C, van Zon S, Bultmann U, Smidt N Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2024; 21(1):31.

PMID: 38486265 PMC: 10941418. DOI: 10.1186/s12966-024-01577-8.


References
1.
Jia P, Cheng X, Xue H, Wang Y . Applications of geographic information systems (GIS) data and methods in obesity-related research. Obes Rev. 2017; 18(4):400-411. DOI: 10.1111/obr.12495. View

2.
Prinsen S, Evers C, de Ridder D . Justified indulgence: self-licensing effects on caloric consumption. Psychol Health. 2018; 34(1):24-43. DOI: 10.1080/08870446.2018.1508683. View

3.
Klijs B, Scholtens S, Mandemakers J, Snieder H, Stolk R, Smidt N . Representativeness of the LifeLines Cohort Study. PLoS One. 2015; 10(9):e0137203. PMC: 4557968. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0137203. View

4.
Jayedi A, Soltani S, Zargar M, Khan T, Shab-Bidar S . Central fatness and risk of all cause mortality: systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of 72 prospective cohort studies. BMJ. 2020; 370:m3324. PMC: 7509947. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.m3324. View

5.
Hendriksen A, Jansen R, Dijkstra S, Huitink M, Seidell J, Poelman M . How healthy and processed are foods and drinks promoted in supermarket sales flyers? A cross-sectional study in the Netherlands. Public Health Nutr. 2021; 24(10):3000-3008. PMC: 9884785. DOI: 10.1017/S1368980021001233. View