» Articles » PMID: 35896613

Spontaneous Motor Recovery After Cervical Spinal Cord Injury: Issues for Nerve Transfer Surgery Decision Making

Overview
Journal Spinal Cord
Specialty Neurology
Date 2022 Jul 27
PMID 35896613
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Study Design: Retrospective cohort study.

Objectives: To quantify spontaneous upper extremity motor recovery between 6 and 12 months after spinal cord injury (SCI) to help guide timing of nerve transfer surgery to improve upper limb function in cervical SCI.

Setting: Nineteen European SCI rehabilitation centers.

Methods: Data was extracted from the European Multicenter Study of SCI database for individuals with mid-level cervical SCI (N = 268). Muscle function grades at 6 and 12 months post-SCI were categorized for analysis.

Results: From 6 to 12 months after SCI, spontaneous surgically-relevant recovery was limited. Of all limbs (N = 263) with grade 0-2 elbow extension at 6 months, 4% regained grade 4-5 and 11% regained grade 3 muscle function at 12 months. Of all limbs (N = 380) with grade 0-2 finger flexion at 6 months, 3% regained grade 4-5 and 5% regained grade 3 muscle function at 12 months.

Conclusion: This information supports early (6 month) post-injury surgical consultation and evaluation. With this information, individuals with SCI can more fully engage in preference-based decision-making about surgical intervention versus continued rehabilitation and spontaneous recovery to gain elbow extension and/or hand opening and closing.

Citing Articles

Assessing an Online Patient Decision Aid about Upper Extremity Reconstructive Surgery for Cervical Spinal Cord Injury: Pilot Testing Knowledge, Decisional Conflict, and Acceptability.

Moritz W, Westman A, Politi M, Dod Working Group , Fox I MDM Policy Pract. 2023; 8(2):23814683231199721.

PMID: 37860721 PMC: 10583528. DOI: 10.1177/23814683231199721.


[Surgical reconstruction of arm and hand functions in tetraplegia : Current concepts].

Schibli S, Friden J Unfallchirurgie (Heidelb). 2023; 126(10):774-777.

PMID: 37676291 DOI: 10.1007/s00113-023-01361-6.

References
1.
Hill E, Fox I . Current Best Peripheral Nerve Transfers for Spinal Cord Injury. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018; 143(1):184e-198e. DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000005173. View

2.
van Zyl N, Hill B, Cooper C, Hahn J, Galea M . Expanding traditional tendon-based techniques with nerve transfers for the restoration of upper limb function in tetraplegia: a prospective case series. Lancet. 2019; 394(10198):565-575. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31143-2. View

3.
Coulet B, Allieu Y, Chammas M . Injured metamere and functional surgery of the tetraplegic upper limb. Hand Clin. 2002; 18(3):399-412, vi. DOI: 10.1016/s0749-0712(02)00020-3. View

4.
Fox I, Novak C, Krauss E, Hoben G, Zaidman C, Ruvinskaya R . The Use of Nerve Transfers to Restore Upper Extremity Function in Cervical Spinal Cord Injury. PM R. 2018; 10(11):1173-1184.e2. DOI: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2018.03.013. View

5.
Berger M, Robinson L, Krauss E . Lower Motor Neuron Abnormality in Chronic Cervical Spinal Cord Injury: Implications for Nerve Transfer Surgery. J Neurotrauma. 2021; 39(3-4):259-265. DOI: 10.1089/neu.2020.7579. View