» Articles » PMID: 35893758

View Normalization of Object Size in the Right Parietal Cortex

Overview
Journal Vision (Basel)
Specialty Ophthalmology
Date 2022 Jul 27
PMID 35893758
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Prior knowledge alters perception already on early levels of processing. For instance, judging the display size of an object is affected by its familiar size. Using functional magnetic resonance imaging, we investigated the neural processes involved in resolving ambiguities between familiar object size and physical object size in 33 healthy human subjects. The familiar size was either small or large, and the object was displayed as either small or large. Thus, the size of the displayed object was either congruent or incongruent with its internally stored canonical size representation. Subjects were asked to indicate where the stimuli appeared on the screen as quickly and accurately as possible, thereby ensuring that differential activations cannot be ascribed to explicit object size judgments. Incongruent (relative to congruent) object displays were associated with enhanced activation of the right intraparietal sulcus (IPS). These data are consistent with but extend previous patient studies, which found the right parietal cortex involved in matching visual objects presented atypically to prototypical object representations, suggesting that the right IPS supports view normalization of objects. In a second experiment, using a parametric design, a region-of-interest analysis supported this notion by showing that increases in size mismatch between the displayed size of an object and its familiar viewing size were associated with an increased right IPS activation. We conclude that the right IPS performs view normalization of mismatched information about the internally stored prototypical size and the current viewing size of an object.

Citing Articles

Application of transcranial alternating current stimulation to improve eSports-related cognitive performance.

Jiao F, Zhuang J, Nitsche M, Lin Z, Ma Y, Liu Y Front Neurosci. 2024; 18:1308370.

PMID: 38476869 PMC: 10927847. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2024.1308370.

References
1.
Song C, Sandberg K, Andersen L, Blicher J, Rees G . Human Occipital and Parietal GABA Selectively Influence Visual Perception of Orientation and Size. J Neurosci. 2017; 37(37):8929-8937. PMC: 5597977. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3945-16.2017. View

2.
Palmer S, Gardner J, Wickens T . Aesthetic issues in spatial composition: effects of position and direction on framing single objects. Spat Vis. 2008; 21(3-5):421-49. DOI: 10.1163/156856808784532662. View

3.
Huang Y, Su L, Ma Q . The Stroop effect: An activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis in healthy young adults. Neurosci Lett. 2019; 716:134683. DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2019.134683. View

4.
Tafuro A, Ambrosini E, Puccioni O, Vallesi A . Brain oscillations in cognitive control: A cross-sectional study with a spatial stroop task. Neuropsychologia. 2019; 133:107190. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2019.107190. View

5.
Melcher T, Gruber O . Oddball and incongruity effects during Stroop task performance: a comparative fMRI study on selective attention. Brain Res. 2006; 1121(1):136-49. DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.08.120. View