Comparison of Different Fixation Methods for Combined Histological and Biomolecular Analysis of Fixed and Decalcified Bone Samples

Overview

Journal Methods Protoc

Specialty General Medicine

Date 2022 Jul 27

PMID 35893590

Authors

Sarah Al-Maawi

Priscilia Valenzuela

Eva Dohle

Anja Heselich

Robert Sader

Shahram Ghanaati

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

The combination of histological and biomolecular analyses provides deep understanding of different biological processes and is of high interest for basic and applied research. However, the available analytical methods are still limited, especially when considering bone samples. This study compared different fixation media to identify a sufficient analytical method for the combination of histological, immuno-histological and biomolecular analyses of the same fixed, processed and paraffin embedded bone sample. Bone core biopsies of rats' femurs were fixed in different media (RNAlater + formaldehyde (R + FFPE), methacarn (MFPE) or formaldehyde (FFPE)) for 1 week prior to decalcification by EDTA and further histological processing and paraffin embedding. Snap freezing (unfixed frozen tissue, UFT) and incubation in RNAlater were used as additional controls. After gaining the paraffin sections for histological and immunohistological analysis, the samples were deparaffined and RNA was isolated by a modified TRIZOL protocol. Subsequently, gene expression was evaluated using RT-qPCR. Comparable histo-morphological and immuno-histological results were evident in all paraffin embedded samples of MFPE, FFPE and R + FFPE. The isolated RNA in the group of MFPE showed a high concentration and high purity, which was comparable to the UFT and RNAlater groups. However, in the groups of FFPE and R + FFPE, the RNA quality and quantity were statistically significantly lower when compared to MFPE, UFT and RNAlater. RT-qPCR results showed a comparable outcome in the group of MFPE and UFT, whereas the groups of FFPE and R + FFPE did not result in a correctly amplified gene product. Sample fixation by means of methacarn is of high interest for clinical samples to allow a combination of histological, immunohistological and biomolecular analysis. The implementation of such evaluation method in clinical research may allow a deeper understanding of the processes of bone formation and regeneration.

References

Skrypina N, Timofeeva A, Khaspekov G, Savochkina L, Beabealashvilli R . Total RNA suitable for molecular biology analysis. J Biotechnol. 2003; 105(1-2):1-9. DOI: 10.1016/s0168-1656(03)00140-8. View

Shibutani M, Uneyama C, Miyazaki K, Toyoda K, Hirose M . Methacarn fixation: a novel tool for analysis of gene expressions in paraffin-embedded tissue specimens. Lab Invest. 2000; 80(2):199-208. DOI: 10.1038/labinvest.3780023. View

Masuda N, Ohnishi T, Kawamoto S, Monden M, Okubo K . Analysis of chemical modification of RNA from formalin-fixed samples and optimization of molecular biology applications for such samples. Nucleic Acids Res. 1999; 27(22):4436-43. PMC: 148727. DOI: 10.1093/nar/27.22.4436. View

Al-Maawi S, Rother S, Halfter N, Fiebig K, Moritz J, Moeller S . Covalent linkage of sulfated hyaluronan to the collagen scaffold Mucograft® enhances scaffold stability and reduces proinflammatory macrophage activation . Bioact Mater. 2021; 8:420-434. PMC: 8429620. DOI: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.06.008. View

Waissbluth S, Chan S, Chen J, McIntosh M, Daniel S . RNA preservation in decalcified cochlear samples. Otol Neurotol. 2012; 34(2):331-7. DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e318278bf1a. View

Bell D, DeMarini D . Excessive cycling converts PCR products to random-length higher molecular weight fragments. Nucleic Acids Res. 1991; 19(18):5079. PMC: 328818. DOI: 10.1093/nar/19.18.5079. View

Zhang Y, Al-Maawi S, Wang X, Sader R, Kirkpatrick C, Ghanaati S . Biomaterial-induced multinucleated giant cells express proinflammatory signaling molecules: A histological study in humans. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2018; 107(4):780-790. DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.36594. View

Kuang J, Yan X, Genders A, Granata C, Bishop D . An overview of technical considerations when using quantitative real-time PCR analysis of gene expression in human exercise research. PLoS One. 2018; 13(5):e0196438. PMC: 5944930. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0196438. View

Ghanaati S, Barbeck M, Lorenz J, Stuebinger S, Seitz O, Landes C . Synthetic bone substitute material comparable with xenogeneic material for bone tissue regeneration in oral cancer patients: First and preliminary histological, histomorphometrical and clinical results. Ann Maxillofac Surg. 2013; 3(2):126-38. PMC: 3814660. DOI: 10.4103/2231-0746.119221. View

10.

Dotti I, Bonin S, Basili G, Nardon E, Balani A, Siracusano S . Effects of formalin, methacarn, and fineFIX fixatives on RNA preservation. Diagn Mol Pathol. 2010; 19(2):112-22. DOI: 10.1097/PDM.0b013e3181b520f8. View

11.

Cepollaro S, Della Bella E, de Biase D, Visani M, Fini M . Evaluation of RNA from human trabecular bone and identification of stable reference genes. J Cell Physiol. 2017; 233(6):4401-4407. DOI: 10.1002/jcp.26319. View

12.

Kim J, Kim H, Hwang M, Shin H, Kim S, Park R . Differential gene expression analysis using paraffin-embedded tissues after laser microdissection. J Cell Biochem. 2003; 90(5):998-1006. DOI: 10.1002/jcb.10680. View

13.

Salmon C, Silverio K, Giorgetti A, Sallum E, Casati M, Nociti Jr F . Gene expression analysis in microdissected samples from decalcified tissues. Diagn Mol Pathol. 2012; 21(2):120-6. DOI: 10.1097/PDM.0b013e31823e9395. View

14.

Lorenz J, Korzinskas T, Chia P, Maawi S, Eichler K, Sader R . Do Clinical and Radiological Assessments Contribute to the Understanding of Biomaterials? Results From a Prospective Randomized Sinus Augmentation Split-Mouth Trial. J Oral Implantol. 2017; 44(1):62-69. DOI: 10.1563/aaid-joi-D-17-00139. View

15.

Dohle E, Singh S, Nishigushi A, Fischer T, Wessling M, Moller M . Human Co- and Triple-Culture Model of the Alveolar-Capillary Barrier on a Basement Membrane Mimic. Tissue Eng Part C Methods. 2018; 24(9):495-503. DOI: 10.1089/ten.TEC.2018.0087. View

16.

Cox M, Schray C, Luster C, Stewart Z, Korytko P, M Khan K . Assessment of fixatives, fixation, and tissue processing on morphology and RNA integrity. Exp Mol Pathol. 2005; 80(2):183-91. DOI: 10.1016/j.yexmp.2005.10.002. View

17.

Marsell R, Einhorn T . The biology of fracture healing. Injury. 2011; 42(6):551-5. PMC: 3105171. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2011.03.031. View

18.

Younger E, Chapman M . Morbidity at bone graft donor sites. J Orthop Trauma. 1989; 3(3):192-5. DOI: 10.1097/00005131-198909000-00002. View

19.

Succo G, Berrone M, Battiston B, Tos P, Goia F, Appendino P . Step-by-step surgical technique for mandibular reconstruction with fibular free flap: application of digital technology in virtual surgical planning. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2014; 272(6):1491-501. DOI: 10.1007/s00405-014-3078-3. View

20.

Shao Y, Wang L, Hicks D, Ballock R . Analysis of gene expression in mineralized skeletal tissues by laser capture microdissection and RT-PCR. Lab Invest. 2006; 86(10):1089-95. DOI: 10.1038/labinvest.3700459. View