» Articles » PMID: 35893589

Comparison of the Effectiveness of Four Commercial DNA Extraction Kits on Fresh and Frozen Human Milk Samples

Overview
Journal Methods Protoc
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2022 Jul 27
PMID 35893589
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

For-profit donor human milk organizations have DNA-based proprietary methodology for testing incoming milk for adulteration with other species' milk. However, there is currently no standardized methodology for extracting DNA from human milk. Microbiome research has shown that DNA purity and quantity can vary depending on the extraction methodology and storage conditions. This study assessed the purity and quantity of DNA extracted from four commercially available DNA extraction kits-including one kit that was developed for human milk. This study was for method validation only. One donor provided a 90 mL human milk sample. The sample was aliquoted into 70 × 1 mL microcentrifuge tubes. Aliquots were randomized into one of three categories: fresh extraction, extraction after freezing, and extraction after purification and storage at room temperature. DNA was analyzed for purity and quantity using a NanoDrop Spectrophotometer. Results confirmed differences in DNA purity and quantity between extraction kits. The Plasma/Serum Circulating DNA Purification Mini Kit (Norgen Biotek, ON, Canada) provided significantly more DNA, and consistent purity as measured by 260/280 and 260/230 ratios. DNA quantity and purity were similar between fresh and frozen human milk samples. These results suggest that DNA purity and quantity is highest and most consistent when extracted from human milk using the Plasma/Serum Circulating DNA Purification Mini Kit amongst the kits tested in this study. Standardized methodology for extracting DNA from human milk is necessary for improvement of research in the field of human milk. To do this, future studies are recommended for optimization of DNA extraction from human milk using larger sample sizes and multiple donor parents.

Citing Articles

Basic concepts, recent advances, and future perspectives in the diagnosis of bovine mastitis.

Algharib S, Dawood A, Huang L, Guo A, Zhao G, Zhou K J Vet Sci. 2024; 25(1):e18.

PMID: 38311330 PMC: 10839174. DOI: 10.4142/jvs.23147.


Identification of Bulgarian Sourdough Microbiota by Metagenomic Approach Using Three Commercially Available DNA Extraction Protocols.

Vassileva I, Baev V, Yahubyan G, Apostolova-Kuzova E, Angelov A, Koprinarova M Food Technol Biotechnol. 2023; 61(1):138-147.

PMID: 37200788 PMC: 10187570. DOI: 10.17113/ftb.61.01.23.7796.


Improvement and Validation of a Genomic DNA Extraction Method for Human Breastmilk.

Aleman-Duarte M, Aguilar-Uscanga B, Garcia-Robles G, Ramirez-Salazar F, Benitez-Garcia I, Balcazar-Lopez E Methods Protoc. 2023; 6(2).

PMID: 37104016 PMC: 10144544. DOI: 10.3390/mps6020034.

References
1.
De Luca M, Ioele G, Spatari C, Caruso L, Galasso M, Ragno G . Evaluation of human breastmilk adulteration by combining Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy and partial least square modeling. Food Sci Nutr. 2019; 7(6):2194-2201. PMC: 6593478. DOI: 10.1002/fsn3.1067. View

2.
Zong X, Wu H, Zhao M, Magnussen C, Xi B . Global prevalence of WHO infant feeding practices in 57 LMICs in 2010-2018 and time trends since 2000 for 44 LMICs. EClinicalMedicine. 2021; 37:100971. PMC: 8343261. DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.100971. View

3.
Cheema A, Stinson L, Lai C, Geddes D, Payne M . DNA extraction method influences human milk bacterial profiles. J Appl Microbiol. 2020; 130(1):142-156. DOI: 10.1111/jam.14780. View

4.
Teich A, Barnett J, Bonuck K . Women's perceptions of breastfeeding barriers in early postpartum period: a qualitative analysis nested in two randomized controlled trials. Breastfeed Med. 2013; 9(1):9-15. PMC: 3903167. DOI: 10.1089/bfm.2013.0063. View

5.
Eidelman A . Informal Milk Sharing: To Be or Not to Be. Breastfeed Med. 2018; 13(1):1. DOI: 10.1089/bfm.2017.29066.aie. View