» Articles » PMID: 35892502

Assessment of Neck Muscle Shear Modulus Normalization in Women with and Without Chronic Neck Pain

Overview
Specialty Radiology
Date 2022 Jul 27
PMID 35892502
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Identifying the objective stiffness of the neck muscles facilitates the early and specific diagnosis of neck pain and targeted therapy. However, individual variation in the muscle shear modulus obscures differences between healthy and diseased individuals. Normalization may improve the comparability between individuals. The shear modulus at different functional tasks served as a reference for normalizing the neck muscles' shear modulus of 38 women, 20 with chronic neck pain and 18 asymptomatic. Reference tasks were , , , . The effects of normalization on within-group variation and between-group differences were compared. Normalization with was discarded due to imaging problems. Normalization with , , , and reduced within-group variation, by 23.2%, 26.8%, 11.6%, and 33.6%, respectively. All four normalization approaches reduced the -values when testing for between-group differences. For the pain group, normalization with and indicated less normalized muscle stiffness, while normalization with and indicated higher stiffness. The contradictory results are explainable by non-significant group differences in the reference tasks. Normalization of the muscle shear modulus is effective to reduce within-group variation, but a trustworthy normalization approach for group comparisons has yet to be identified.

References
1.
Marras W, Davis K, Maronitis A . A non-MVC EMG normalization technique for the trunk musculature: Part 2. Validation and use to predict spinal loads. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2001; 11(1):11-8. DOI: 10.1016/s1050-6411(00)00040-7. View

2.
Dieterich A, Andrade R, Le Sant G, Falla D, Petzke F, Hug F . Shear wave elastography reveals different degrees of passive and active stiffness of the neck extensor muscles. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2016; 117(1):171-178. DOI: 10.1007/s00421-016-3509-5. View

3.
Brandenburg J, Eby S, Song P, Kingsley-Berg S, Bamlet W, Sieck G . Quantifying passive muscle stiffness in children with and without cerebral palsy using ultrasound shear wave elastography. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2016; 58(12):1288-1294. PMC: 5118061. DOI: 10.1111/dmcn.13179. View

4.
Cote P, van der Velde G, Cassidy J, Carroll L, Hogg-Johnson S, Holm L . The burden and determinants of neck pain in workers: results of the Bone and Joint Decade 2000-2010 Task Force on Neck Pain and Its Associated Disorders. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2009; 32(2 Suppl):S70-86. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2008.11.012. View

5.
Dieterich A, Yavuz U, Petzke F, Nordez A, Falla D . Neck Muscle Stiffness Measured With Shear Wave Elastography in Women With Chronic Nonspecific Neck Pain. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2020; 50(4):179-188. DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2020.8821. View