» Articles » PMID: 35891211

A Comparative Analysis of a Self-Reported Adverse Events Analysis After Receiving One of the Available SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine Schemes in Ecuador

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has put a lot of pressure on health systems worldwide. Mass vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 has reduced morbidity and mortality worldwide. Despite their safety profiles, vaccines, as with any other medical product, can cause adverse events. Yet, in countries with poor epidemiological surveillance and monitoring systems, reporting vaccine-related adverse events is a challenge. The objective of this study was to describe self-reported vaccine adverse events after receiving one of the available COVID-19 vaccine schemes in Ecuador. A cross-sectional analysis based on an online, self-reported, 32-item questionnaire was conducted in Ecuador from 1 April to 15 July 2021. Participants were invited by social media, radio, and TV to voluntarily participate in our study. A total of 6654 participants were included in this study. Furthermore, 38.2% of the participants reported having at least one comorbidity. Patients received AstraZeneca, Pfizer, and Sinovac vaccines, and these were distributed 38.4%, 31.1%, and 30.5%, respectively. Overall, pain or swelling at the injection site 17.2% ( = 4500) and headache 13.3% ( = 3502) were the most reported adverse events. Women addressed events supposedly attributable to vaccination or immunization [ESAVIs] (66.7%), more often than men (33.2%). After receiving the first dose of any available COVID-19 vaccine, a total of 19,501 self-reported ESAVIs were informed (87.0% were mild, 11.5% moderate, and 1.5% severe). In terms of the vaccine type and brand, the most reactogenic vaccine was AstraZeneca with 57.8%, followed by Pfizer (24.9%) and Sinovac (17.3%). After the second dose, 6776 self-reported ESAVIs were reported (87.1% mild, 10.9% moderate, and 2.1% severe). AstraZeneca vaccine users reported a higher proportion of ESAVIs (72.2%) in comparison to Pfizer/BioNTech (15.9%) and Sinovac Vaccine (11.9%). Swelling at the injection site, headache, muscle pain, and fatigue were the most common ESAVIs for the first as well as second doses. In conclusion, most ESAVIs were mild. AstraZeneca users were more likely to report adverse events. Participants without a history of COVID-19 infection, as well as those who received the first dose, were more prone to report ESAVIs.

Citing Articles

Effects of age and gender on immunogenicity and reactogenicity of SpikoGen recombinant spike protein vaccine: a post-hoc analysis.

Anjidani N, Shahpari R, Kafi H, Petrovsky N, Barati S Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):22631.

PMID: 39349494 PMC: 11442574. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-67945-3.


E-cigarette use among Ecuadorian adults: A national cross-sectional study on use rates, perceptions, and associated factors.

Izquierdo-Condoy J, Naranjo-Lara P, Morales-Lapo E, Puglla-Mendoza A, Hidalgo M, Tello-De-la-Torre A Tob Induc Dis. 2024; 22.

PMID: 38828079 PMC: 11141133. DOI: 10.18332/tid/187878.


Surveillance of COVID-19 vaccines: A comprehensive analysis of the first immunization drive in Ecuador.

Orellana-Manzano A, Garcia-Angulo A, Cordeiro F, Carvajal-Aldaz D, Centeno E, Vizcaino M Heliyon. 2024; 10(6):e27464.

PMID: 38509901 PMC: 10951513. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e27464.


Leveraging Virtual Technology to Conduct Clinical Trials in Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

Noor N, Siegel C Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y). 2023; 19(8):468-474.

PMID: 37772152 PMC: 10524427.


A Case Series and Literature Review of Telogen Effluvium and Alopecia Universalis after the Administration of a Heterologous COVID-19 Vaccine Scheme.

Hernandez Arroyo J, Izquierdo-Condoy J, Ortiz-Prado E Vaccines (Basel). 2023; 11(2).

PMID: 36851320 PMC: 9968192. DOI: 10.3390/vaccines11020444.


References
1.
Menni C, Klaser K, May A, Polidori L, Capdevila J, Louca P . Vaccine side-effects and SARS-CoV-2 infection after vaccination in users of the COVID Symptom Study app in the UK: a prospective observational study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2021; 21(7):939-949. PMC: 8078878. DOI: 10.1016/S1473-3099(21)00224-3. View

2.
Plotkin S, Plotkin S . The development of vaccines: how the past led to the future. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2011; 9(12):889-93. DOI: 10.1038/nrmicro2668. View

3.
Kyriakidis N, Lopez-Cortes A, Gonzalez E, Grimaldos A, Prado E . SARS-CoV-2 vaccines strategies: a comprehensive review of phase 3 candidates. NPJ Vaccines. 2021; 6(1):28. PMC: 7900244. DOI: 10.1038/s41541-021-00292-w. View

4.
Sayegh M, Merhi A, Naal H, Saleh S . Global vaccination strategy to eradicate COVID-19: Beyond science. J Glob Health. 2021; 11:03113. PMC: 8590821. DOI: 10.7189/jogh.11.03113. View

5.
Omeish H, Najadat A, Al-Azzam S, Tarabin N, Abu Hameed A, Al-Gallab N . Reported COVID-19 vaccines side effects among Jordanian population: a cross sectional study. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2021; 18(1):1981086. PMC: 8920252. DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2021.1981086. View