An Efficient Hybrid Methodology for Local Activation Waves Detection Under Complex Fractionated Atrial Electrograms of Atrial Fibrillation

Overview

Journal Sensors (Basel)

Publisher MDPI

Specialty Biotechnology

Date 2022 Jul 27

PMID 35891025

Authors

Diego Osorio

Aikaterini Vraka

Aurelio Quesada

Fernando Hornero

Raul Alcaraz

Jose J Rieta

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Local activation waves (LAWs) detection in complex fractionated atrial electrograms (CFAEs) during catheter ablation (CA) of atrial fibrillation (AF), the commonest cardiac arrhythmia, is a complicated task due to their extreme variability and heterogeneity in amplitude and morphology. There are few published works on reliable LAWs detectors, which are efficient for regular or low fractionated bipolar electrograms (EGMs) but lack satisfactory results when CFAEs are analyzed. The aim of the present work is the development of a novel optimized method for LAWs detection in CFAEs in order to assist cardiac mapping and catheter ablation (CA) guidance. The database consists of 119 bipolar EGMs classified by AF types according to Wells' classification. The proposed method introduces an alternative Botteron's preprocessing technique targeting the slow and small-ampitude activations. The lower band-pass filter cut-off frequency is modified to 20 Hz, and a hyperbolic tangent function is applied over CFAEs. Detection is firstly performed through an amplitude-based threshold and an escalating cycle-length (CL) analysis. Activation time is calculated at each LAW's barycenter. Analysis is applied in five-second overlapping segments. LAWs were manually annotated by two experts and compared with algorithm-annotated LAWs. AF types I and II showed 100% accuracy and sensitivity. AF type III showed 92.77% accuracy and 95.30% sensitivity. The results of this study highlight the efficiency of the developed method in precisely detecting LAWs in CFAEs. Hence, it could be implemented on real-time mapping devices and used during CA, providing robust detection results regardless of the fractionation degree of the analyzed recordings.

Citing Articles

A Review of Personalised Cardiac Computational Modelling Using Electroanatomical Mapping Data.

Jaffery O, Melki L, Slabaugh G, Good W, Roney C Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev. 2024; 13():e08.

PMID: 38807744 PMC: 11131150. DOI: 10.15420/aer.2023.25.

Comparative Study of Methods for Cycle Length Estimation in Fractionated Electrograms of Atrial Fibrillation.

Osorio D, Vraka A, Moreno-Arribas J, Bertomeu-Gonzalez V, Alcaraz R, Rieta J J Pers Med. 2022; 12(10).

PMID: 36294851 PMC: 9604643. DOI: 10.3390/jpm12101712.

Practical Considerations for the Application of Nonlinear Indices Characterizing the Atrial Substrate in Atrial Fibrillation.

Finotti E, Quesada A, Ciaccio E, Garan H, Hornero F, Alcaraz R Entropy (Basel). 2022; 24(9).

PMID: 36141147 PMC: 9497841. DOI: 10.3390/e24091261.

References

Martinez-Iniesta M, Rodenas J, Rieta J, Alcaraz R . The stationary wavelet transform as an efficient reductor of powerline interference for atrial bipolar electrograms in cardiac electrophysiology. Physiol Meas. 2019; 40(7):075003. DOI: 10.1088/1361-6579/ab2cb8. View

Abdi B, Hendriks R, Veen A, de Groot N . Improved local activation time annotation of fractionated atrial electrograms for atrial mapping. Comput Biol Med. 2019; 117:103590. DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2019.103590. View

Kowalewski C . Mapping atrial fibrillation : An overview of potential mechanisms underlying atrial fibrillation. Herz. 2021; 46(4):305-311. DOI: 10.1007/s00059-021-05045-y. View

Knecht S, Pradella M, Reichlin T, Muhl A, Bossard M, Stieltjes B . Left atrial anatomy, atrial fibrillation burden, and P-wave duration-relationships and predictors for single-procedure success after pulmonary vein isolation. Europace. 2017; 20(2):271-278. DOI: 10.1093/europace/euw376. View

Botteron G, Smith J . A technique for measurement of the extent of spatial organization of atrial activation during atrial fibrillation in the intact human heart. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1995; 42(6):579-86. DOI: 10.1109/10.387197. View

Wells Jr J, Karp R, Kouchoukos N, MACLEAN W, James T, Waldo A . Characterization of atrial fibrillation in man: studies following open heart surgery. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1978; 1(4):426-38. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1978.tb03504.x. View

Lin W, Tai C, Hsieh M, Tsai C, Lin Y, Tsao H . Catheter ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation initiated by non-pulmonary vein ectopy. Circulation. 2003; 107(25):3176-83. DOI: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000074206.52056.2D. View

Kuklik P, Zeemering S, van Hunnik A, Maesen B, Pison L, Lau D . Identification of Rotors during Human Atrial Fibrillation Using Contact Mapping and Phase Singularity Detection: Technical Considerations. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2016; 64(2):310-318. DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2016.2554660. View

Nagy S, Kasi P, Afonso V, Bird N, Pederson B, Mann I . Cycle Length Evaluation in Persistent Atrial Fibrillation Using Kernel Density Estimation to Identify Transient and Stable Rapid Atrial Activity. Cardiovasc Eng Technol. 2021; 13(2):219-233. PMC: 9114079. DOI: 10.1007/s13239-021-00568-1. View

10.

Sahli Costabal F, Zaman J, Kuhl E, Narayan S . Interpreting Activation Mapping of Atrial Fibrillation: A Hybrid Computational/Physiological Study. Ann Biomed Eng. 2017; 46(2):257-269. PMC: 5880222. DOI: 10.1007/s10439-017-1969-3. View

11.

Antz M, Otomo K, Arruda M, Scherlag B, Pitha J, Tondo C . Electrical conduction between the right atrium and the left atrium via the musculature of the coronary sinus. Circulation. 1998; 98(17):1790-5. DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.98.17.1790. View

12.

Allessie M, de Groot N, Houben R, Schotten U, Boersma E, Smeets J . Electropathological substrate of long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation in patients with structural heart disease: longitudinal dissociation. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2010; 3(6):606-15. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCEP.109.910125. View

13.

Lee S, Ryu K, Waldo A, Khrestian C, Durand D, Sahadevan J . An algorithm to measure beat-to-beat cycle lengths for assessment of atrial electrogram rate and regularity during atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2012; 24(2):199-206. DOI: 10.1111/jce.12014. View

14.

Della Rocca D, Tarantino N, Trivedi C, Mohanty S, Anannab A, Salwan A . Non-pulmonary vein triggers in nonparoxysmal atrial fibrillation: Implications of pathophysiology for catheter ablation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2020; 31(8):2154-2167. DOI: 10.1111/jce.14638. View

15.

Houben R, Allessie M . Processing of intracardiac electrograms in atrial fibrillation. Diagnosis of electropathological substrate of AF. IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag. 2007; 25(6):40-51. DOI: 10.1109/emb-m.2006.250507. View

16.

Vraka A, Hornero F, Bertomeu-Gonzalez V, Osca J, Alcaraz R, Rieta J . Short-Time Estimation of Fractionation in Atrial Fibrillation with Coarse-Grained Correlation Dimension for Mapping the Atrial Substrate. Entropy (Basel). 2020; 22(2). PMC: 7516661. DOI: 10.3390/e22020232. View

17.

Narayan S, Krummen D, Rappel W . Clinical mapping approach to diagnose electrical rotors and focal impulse sources for human atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2012; 23(5):447-54. PMC: 3418865. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2012.02332.x. View

18.

Rostock T, Rotter M, Sanders P, Takahashi Y, Jais P, Hocini M . High-density activation mapping of fractionated electrograms in the atria of patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Heart Rhythm. 2006; 3(1):27-34. DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2005.09.019. View

19.

Sanchez-Quintana D, Lopez-Minguez J, Pizarro G, Murillo M, Cabrera J . Triggers and anatomical substrates in the genesis and perpetuation of atrial fibrillation. Curr Cardiol Rev. 2012; 8(4):310-26. PMC: 3492815. DOI: 10.2174/157340312803760721. View

20.

Gaeta S, Bahnson T, Henriquez C . High-Resolution Measurement of Local Activation Time Differences From Bipolar Electrogram Amplitude. Front Physiol. 2021; 12:653645. PMC: 8100452. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2021.653645. View