» Articles » PMID: 35889750

Compromised Hindgut Microbial Digestion, Rather Than Chemical Digestion in the Foregut, Leads to Decreased Nutrient Digestibility in Pigs Fed Low-Protein Diets

Overview
Journal Nutrients
Date 2022 Jul 27
PMID 35889750
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Reduced nutrient digestibility due to low-protein (LP) diets occurring in the foregut or hindgut of pigs remains unclear. Methods: Growing barrows (21.7 ± 1.7 kg) were allotted into LP and high-protein (HP) diet treatments. Ileal digesta and feces were collected for in vitro cross-fermentation and microbial sequencing, and cross-feeding assessed nutrient digestibility. Results: No difference in foregut digesta flora and nutrient digestibility between treatments was observed. LP diet caused decreased total tract digestibility of dry matter (DM), organic matter (OM), gross energy (GE), neutral detergent fiber (NDF), and acid detergent fiber (ADF) compared with the HP diet (p < 0.05). The fermentation broth from LP diet-fed pigs induced less full fermentation digestion of DM, OM, crude protein, and GE than HP broth (p < 0.05). Additionally, LP broth fermentation presented lower fermentation gas and short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) generation than HP group (p < 0.05). This situation above may be related to decreased abundances of Lachnospiraceae, Eubacterium_eligens_group, Roseburia, and Ruminococcaceae_UCG-009, which can efficiently ferment nutrients to produce SCFA. Conclusions: Change in the flora caused compromise in hindgut microbial fermentation digestion leads to decreased total tract nutrient digestibility in pigs fed an LP diet.

Citing Articles

The Interactive Effects of Nutrient Density and Breed on Growth Performance and Gut Microbiota in Broilers.

Jia M, Lei J, Dong Y, Guo Y, Zhang B Animals (Basel). 2024; 14(23).

PMID: 39682493 PMC: 11639963. DOI: 10.3390/ani14233528.


Precise evaluation of the nutritional value of yeast culture and its effect on pigs fed low-protein diets.

Hu B, Liu T, Xia B, Dong Y, Liu M, Zhou J Anim Nutr. 2024; 19:325-338.

PMID: 39640552 PMC: 11617308. DOI: 10.1016/j.aninu.2024.05.010.


Productive, Physiological, and Environmental Implications of Reducing Crude Protein Content in Swine Diets: A Review.

de Almeida A, Latorre M, Alvarez-Rodriguez J Animals (Basel). 2024; 14(21).

PMID: 39518804 PMC: 11544889. DOI: 10.3390/ani14213081.


Evaluation of different ratios of neutral detergent-soluble carbohydrate fractions on performance, ingestive behavior, and nitrogen balance in dairy goats.

Bomfim M, Rodrigues M, Oliveira T Trop Anim Health Prod. 2024; 56(4):159.

PMID: 38730223 DOI: 10.1007/s11250-024-04014-x.


Dietary crude protein time-dependently modulates the bacterial community and metabolites and changes dietary nutrient efficiency in growing pigs.

Wang Y, Zhou J, Cao N, Wang L, Tu J, Zeng X Anim Nutr. 2024; 17:1-10.

PMID: 38434773 PMC: 10904165. DOI: 10.1016/j.aninu.2023.11.007.

References
1.
Jiang Q, He X, Zou Y, Ding Y, Li H, Chen H . Altered gut microbiome promotes proteinuria in mice induced by Adriamycin. AMB Express. 2018; 8(1):31. PMC: 5833890. DOI: 10.1186/s13568-018-0558-7. View

2.
Bai Y, Zhao J, Tao S, Zhou X, Pi Y, Gerrits W . Effect of dietary fiber fermentation on short-chain fatty acid production and microbial composition in vitro. J Sci Food Agric. 2020; 100(11):4282-4291. DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.10470. View

3.
Wang Y, Zhou J, Wang G, Cai S, Zeng X, Qiao S . Advances in low-protein diets for swine. J Anim Sci Biotechnol. 2018; 9:60. PMC: 6052556. DOI: 10.1186/s40104-018-0276-7. View

4.
Snook J, Meyer J . RESPONSE OF DIGESTIVE ENZYMES TO DIETARY PROTEIN. J Nutr. 1964; 82(4):409-14. DOI: 10.1093/jn/82.4.409. View

5.
Snelling T, Auffret M, Duthie C, Stewart R, Watson M, Dewhurst R . Temporal stability of the rumen microbiota in beef cattle, and response to diet and supplements. Anim Microbiome. 2021; 1(1):16. PMC: 7807515. DOI: 10.1186/s42523-019-0018-y. View