» Articles » PMID: 35887756

Factors Affecting the Success of Endodontic Microsurgery: A Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Study

Overview
Journal J Clin Med
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2022 Jul 27
PMID 35887756
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The purpose of this retrospective study was to verify preoperative local parameters of periapical lesions evaluated on cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans as a potential prognostic factor in endodontic microsurgery (EMS). Among 89 cases, local factors (dimensions of lesion, bone destruction pattern, presence/absence of cortical bone destruction, height of buccal bone plate, apical extend of root canal filling, presence/absence of communication with anatomical cavities, type of lesion restriction) were measured on preoperative CBCT images before EMS. At least one year after surgery, the outcome of EMS was classified as a success or a failure. Ten cases (11.24%) were classified as a failure and 79 as a success (88.76%). Symptomatic lesions (OR = 0.088 (95% CI 0.011-0.731); = 0.024), apicomarginal lesions (OR = 0.092 (0.021-0.402); = 0.001) and an association with molar teeth (OR = 0.153 (0.032-0.732); = 0.019) were found as negative predictive factors in the univariate analysis, whereas large apicocoronal dimension (OR = 0.664 (0.477-0.926); = 0.016), apicomarginal lesions (OR = 0.058 (0.006-0.55); = 0.013), and an association with molar teeth (OR = 0.047 (0.003-0.869); = 0.04) were identified as negative predictive factors in the multivariate analysis model. Symptomatic lesions, apicomarginal lesions, lesions associated with molar teeth and large apicocoronal dimensions are significantly associated with the failure of EMS.

Citing Articles

The association of endodontic prognostic factors with the presence of periapical lesion, its volume, and bone characteristics in endodontically treated molars: a cross-sectional study.

Zargar N, Khosravi K, Zadsirjan S, Safi Y, Vatankhah M, Baghban A BMC Oral Health. 2024; 24(1):28.

PMID: 38183066 PMC: 10771002. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-023-03818-x.


Treatment-Related Factors Affecting the Success of Endodontic Microsurgery and the Influence of GTR on Radiographic Healing-A Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Study.

Bieszczad D, Wichlinski J, Kaczmarzyk T J Clin Med. 2023; 12(19).

PMID: 37835026 PMC: 10573613. DOI: 10.3390/jcm12196382.


Conservative endodontic microsurgery to protect critical anatomical structures-selective curettage: a case series.

Li N, Zhang R, Qiao W, Meng L BMC Oral Health. 2023; 23(1):615.

PMID: 37653381 PMC: 10470014. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-023-03287-2.

References
1.
McHugh M . Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic. Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2012; 22(3):276-82. PMC: 3900052. View

2.
Testori T, Capelli M, Milani S, Weinstein R . Success and failure in periradicular surgery: a longitudinal retrospective analysis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1999; 87(4):493-8. DOI: 10.1016/s1079-2104(99)70250-7. View

3.
Taschieri S, Fabbro M, Testori T, Weinstein R . Efficacy of xenogeneic bone grafting with guided tissue regeneration in the management of bone defects after surgical endodontics. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007; 65(6):1121-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2006.10.022. View

4.
Maddalone M, Gagliani M . Periapical endodontic surgery: a 3-year follow-up study. Int Endod J. 2003; 36(3):193-8. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2591.2003.00642.x. View

5.
Wesson C, Gale T . Molar apicectomy with amalgam root-end filling: results of a prospective study in two district general hospitals. Br Dent J. 2004; 195(12):707-14. DOI: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4810834. View