» Articles » PMID: 35885807

CT-Based Radiomic Analysis May Predict Bacteriological Features of Infected Intraperitoneal Fluid Collections After Gastric Cancer Surgery

Overview
Specialty Health Services
Date 2022 Jul 27
PMID 35885807
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The ability of texture analysis (TA) features to discriminate between different types of infected fluid collections, as seen on computed tomography (CT) images, has never been investigated. The study comprised forty patients who had pathological post-operative fluid collections following gastric cancer surgery and underwent CT scans. Patients were separated into six groups based on advanced microbiological analysis of the fluid: mono bacterial ( = 16)/multiple-bacterial ( = 24)/fungal ( = 14)/non-fungal ( = 26) infection and drug susceptibility tests into: multiple drug-resistance bacteria ( = 23) and non-resistant bacteria ( = 17). Dedicated software was used to extract the collections' TA parameters. The parameters obtained were used to compare fungal and non-fungal infections, mono-bacterial and multiple-bacterial infections, and multiresistant and non-resistant infections. Univariate and receiver operating characteristic analyses and the calculation of sensitivity (Se) and specificity (Sp) were used to identify the best-suited parameters for distinguishing between the selected groups. TA parameters were able to differentiate between fungal and non-fungal collections (ATeta3, = 0.02; 55% Se, 100% Sp), mono and multiple-bacterial (CN2D6AngScMom, = 0.03); 80% Se, 64.29% Sp) and between multiresistant and non-multiresistant collections (CN2D6Contrast, = 0.04; 100% Se, 50% Sp). CT-based TA can statistically differentiate between different types of infected fluid collections. However, it is unclear which of the fluids' micro or macroscopic features are reflected by the texture parameters. In addition, this cohort is used as a training cohort for the imaging algorithm, with further validation cohorts being required to confirm the changes detected by the algorithm.

Citing Articles

Computed tomography texture analysis to discriminate fungal and non-fungal infected fluid collections.

Schnarkowski B, Leonhardi J, Mehdorn M, Gockel I, Prasse G, Ebel S J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2023; 10(6):064002.

PMID: 38074630 PMC: 10704181. DOI: 10.1117/1.JMI.10.6.064002.


Textural Analysis of the Hyperdense Artery Sign in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke Predicts the Outcome of Thrombectomy.

Marginean L, Filep R, Suciu B, Jovin T, Stefan P, Lupean R J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2023; 10(9).

PMID: 37754788 PMC: 10532176. DOI: 10.3390/jcdd10090359.


Role of radiomics in predicting lymph node metastasis in gastric cancer: a systematic review.

Micciche F, Rizzo G, Casa C, Leone M, Quero G, Boldrini L Front Med (Lausanne). 2023; 10:1189740.

PMID: 37663653 PMC: 10469447. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1189740.

References
1.
Radosa C, Radosa J, Laniado M, Brandt J, Streitzig J, Seppelt D . Infected versus sterile abdominal fluid collections in postoperative CT: a scoring system based on clinical and imaging findings. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2020; 45(9):2871-2878. DOI: 10.1007/s00261-020-02635-y. View

2.
Ordonez A, Jain S . Pathogen-Specific Bacterial Imaging in Nuclear Medicine. Semin Nucl Med. 2018; 48(2):182-194. PMC: 5819618. DOI: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2017.11.003. View

3.
Thompson J, Paterson-Brown S, Harbourne T, Whawell S, Kalodiki E, Dudley H . Reduced human peritoneal plasminogen activating activity: possible mechanism of adhesion formation. Br J Surg. 1989; 76(4):382-4. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.1800760422. View

4.
Stefan P, Csutak C, Lebovici A, Rusu G, Mihu C . Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging as a Noninvasive Parameter for Differentiating Benign and Malignant Intraperitoneal Collections. Medicina (Kaunas). 2020; 56(5). PMC: 7279298. DOI: 10.3390/medicina56050217. View

5.
Magiorakos A, Srinivasan A, Carey R, Carmeli Y, Falagas M, Giske C . Multidrug-resistant, extensively drug-resistant and pandrug-resistant bacteria: an international expert proposal for interim standard definitions for acquired resistance. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2011; 18(3):268-81. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2011.03570.x. View