» Articles » PMID: 35879678

ASSIST: a Reablement Program for Older Adults in Sweden - a Feasibility Study

Overview
Journal BMC Geriatr
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Geriatrics
Date 2022 Jul 25
PMID 35879678
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Western countries emphasise the provision of assistive home care by implementing reablement services. Reablement services are offered to a limited degree in Sweden, and systematic research regarding outcomes and how reablement can be tailored to maximize benefits for older adults has been lacking. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of a novel reablement program (ASSIST 1.0) regarding study design and outcome measures, as well as fidelity, adherence, and acceptability of the program in a Swedish context.

Method: A non-randomised, quasi-experimental, mixed-method, pre/post-test design was applied with an intervention group receiving ASSIST 1.0 (n = 7) and a control group receiving regular home care (n = 10). ASSIST 1.0 was developed to empower older adults to increase their perceived performance and satisfaction of performing activities in everyday life as well as increase their perceived health, self-efficacy, and well-being. ASSIST 1.0 was founded on the concept of reablement and included three components: i) goal setting with The Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM), ii) provided support to home care staff to enhance their provision of reablement, and iii) explored the incorporation and use of an information- and communication technology (ICT) to facilitate information transfer.

Results: Using COPM for goal setting with older adults and providing support to the staff via workshops were valuable components in the delivery of ASSIST 1.0. The ICT product encountered several challenges and could not be evaluated. COPM and EQ-5D were deemed the most important instruments. Organisational and political barriers affected the feasibility. Although, the fidelity and adherence were complied the staff perceived the program to be acceptable.

Conclusion: The ASSIST 1.0 program was feasible in regard of study design, delivering the intervention, and evaluating instruments that detected a change. A logical progression would be to conduct a full-scale trial. In addition, a usability study to evaluate the technological component is also recommended. With minor improvements, the ASSIST 1.0 program has the potential to contribute to the development of a home care organisation that could enhance older adults possibility to age in place at home.

Trial Registration Number: NCT03505619.

Citing Articles

It's Like Doing Simultaneous Mind Puzzles: Exploring How Care is Understood and Experienced by Nursing Assistants Working in Sweden with Older Persons.

Lilienthal A, Farias L, Bostrom A, Patomella A, Asaba E J Multidiscip Healthc. 2025; 18():209-221.

PMID: 39844922 PMC: 11750625. DOI: 10.2147/JMDH.S496365.


Developing and testing the feasibility of a new internet-based intervention-A case study of people with stroke and occupational therapists.

Barcheus I, Ranner M, Nyman A, Lexell E, Larsson-Lund M PLoS One. 2023; 18(12):e0296364.

PMID: 38153937 PMC: 10754454. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0296364.


Factors that influence the implementation of innovation in aged care: a scoping review.

Windle A, Marshall A, de la Perrelle L, Champion S, Ross P, Harvey G JBI Evid Implement. 2023; .

PMID: 38153118 PMC: 11163893. DOI: 10.1097/XEB.0000000000000407.


Development and content of a community-based reablement programme (I-MANAGE): a co-creation study.

Mouchaers I, Verbeek H, Kempen G, van Haastregt J, Vlaeyen E, Goderis G BMJ Open. 2023; 13(8):e070890.

PMID: 37648386 PMC: 10471872. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070890.


Publication Trends in Reablement - A Scoping Review.

Guadana J, Oyeneyin B, Moe C, Tuntland H J Multidiscip Healthc. 2023; 16:1641-1660.

PMID: 37333025 PMC: 10276570. DOI: 10.2147/JMDH.S407802.


References
1.
Hjelle K, Skutle O, Alvsvag H, Forland O . Reablement teams' roles: a qualitative study of interdisciplinary teams' experiences. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2018; 11:305-316. PMC: 6037265. DOI: 10.2147/JMDH.S160480. View

2.
Bolignano D, Mattace-Raso F, Torino C, DArrigo G, Abd ElHafeez S, Abd ElHafeez S . The quality of reporting in clinical research: the CONSORT and STROBE initiatives. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2013; 25(1):9-15. DOI: 10.1007/s40520-013-0007-z. View

3.
Moore G, Audrey S, Barker M, Bond L, Bonell C, Hardeman W . Process evaluation of complex interventions: Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ. 2015; 350:h1258. PMC: 4366184. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.h1258. View

4.
Gustafsson L, Ostlund G, Zander V, Elfstrom M, Anbacken E . 'Best fit' caring skills of an interprofessional team in short-term goal-directed reablement: older adults' perceptions. Scand J Caring Sci. 2019; 33(2):498-506. DOI: 10.1111/scs.12650. View

5.
Lewin G, Alfonso H, Alan J . Evidence for the long term cost effectiveness of home care reablement programs. Clin Interv Aging. 2013; 8:1273-81. PMC: 3794867. DOI: 10.2147/CIA.S49164. View