» Articles » PMID: 35876409

Mortality and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients Presenting With Non-ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction Despite No Standard Modifiable Risk Factors: Results From the SWEDEHEART Registry

Abstract

Background A significant proportion of patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (MI) have no standard modifiable cardiovascular risk factors (SMuRFs) and have unexpected worse 30-day outcomes compared with those with SMuRFs. The aim of this article is to examine outcomes of patients with non-ST-segment-elevation MI in the absence of SMuRFs. Methods and Results Presenting features, management, and outcomes of patients with non-ST-segment-elevation MI without SmuRFs (hypertension, diabetes, hypercholesterolemia, smoking) were compared with those with SmuRFs in the Swedish MI registry SWEDEHEART (Swedish Web-System for Enhancement and Development of Evidence-Based Care in Heart Disease Evaluated According to Recommended Therapies; 2005-2018). Cox proportional hazard models were used. Out of 99 718 patients with non-ST-segment-elevation MI, 11 131 (11.2%) had no SMuRFs. Patients without SMuRFs had higher all-cause and cardiovascular mortality at 30 days (hazard ratio [HR], 1.20 [95% CI, 1.10-1.30], <0.0001; and HR, 1.25 [95% CI, 1.13-1.38]), a difference that remained after adjustment for age and sex. SMuRF-less patients were less likely to receive secondary prevention statins (76% versus 82%); angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockade (54% versus 72%); or β-blockers (81% versus 87%, for all <0.0001), with lowest rates observed in women without SMuRFs. In patients who survived to 30 days, rates of all-cause and cardiovascular death were lower in patients without SMuRFs compared with those with risk factors, over 12 years. Conclusions One in 10 patients presenting with non-ST-segment-elevation MI present without traditional risk factors. The excess 30-day mortality rate in this group emphasizes the need for both improved population-based strategies for prevention of MI, as well as the need for equitable evidence-based treatment at the time of an MI.

Citing Articles

Long-term outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention without standard modifiable cardiovascular risk factors: findings from the OPT-CAD cohort.

Jiang Z, Liu H, Qiu M, Li J, Zhao W, Zhang D BMC Med. 2025; 23(1):112.

PMID: 39988674 PMC: 11849167. DOI: 10.1186/s12916-025-03933-2.


Absence of Standard Modifiable Risk Factors in Middle Eastern Patients with Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease. The Jordan Absence of Standard Modifiable Risk Factors (SMuRF-Less) Study.

Hammoudeh A, Aldalalah M, Smadi E, Alrishoud D, Alomari A, Alkhawaldeh M Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2025; 21:39-50.

PMID: 39931041 PMC: 11807772. DOI: 10.2147/VHRM.S499355.


Sex differences in survival following acute coronary syndrome with and without standard modifiable risk factors.

Anand V, Koh J, Teo T, Chin Y, Mahesh R, Chan M Clin Res Cardiol. 2024; .

PMID: 39531081 DOI: 10.1007/s00392-024-02563-7.


Recurrence of Cardiovascular Events After an Acute Myocardial Infarction in Patients with Multivessel Disease and Associated Healthcare Costs: A German Claims Data Analysis.

Starry A, Picker N, Galduf J, Maywald U, Dittmar A, Spitzer S Pharmacoeconomics. 2024; 43(2):177-189.

PMID: 39497007 DOI: 10.1007/s40273-024-01440-5.


Vascular Cytokines and Atherosclerosis: Differential Serum Levels of TRAIL, IL-18, and OPG in Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease.

Bate K, Genetzakis E, Vescovi J, Gray M, Celermajer D, McGuire H Biomolecules. 2024; 14(9).

PMID: 39334884 PMC: 11430378. DOI: 10.3390/biom14091119.


References
1.
Figtree G, Vernon S . Coronary artery disease patients without standard modifiable risk factors (SMuRFs)- a forgotten group calling out for new discoveries. Cardiovasc Res. 2021; 117(6):e76-e78. DOI: 10.1093/cvr/cvab145. View

2.
Naghavi M, Libby P, Falk E, Casscells S, Litovsky S, Rumberger J . From vulnerable plaque to vulnerable patient: a call for new definitions and risk assessment strategies: Part I. Circulation. 2003; 108(14):1664-72. DOI: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000087480.94275.97. View

3.
Vernon S, Coffey S, Bhindi R, Soo Hoo S, Nelson G, Ward M . Increasing proportion of ST elevation myocardial infarction patients with coronary atherosclerosis poorly explained by standard modifiable risk factors. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2017; 24(17):1824-1830. DOI: 10.1177/2047487317720287. View

4.
Kott K, Vernon S, Hansen T, de Dreu M, Das S, Powell J . Single-Cell Immune Profiling in Coronary Artery Disease: The Role of State-of-the-Art Immunophenotyping With Mass Cytometry in the Diagnosis of Atherosclerosis. J Am Heart Assoc. 2020; 9(24):e017759. PMC: 7955359. DOI: 10.1161/JAHA.120.017759. View

5.
Lewington S, Clarke R, Qizilbash N, Peto R, Collins R . Age-specific relevance of usual blood pressure to vascular mortality: a meta-analysis of individual data for one million adults in 61 prospective studies. Lancet. 2002; 360(9349):1903-13. DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(02)11911-8. View