» Articles » PMID: 35875863

Parameter Tuning of Time-frequency Masking Algorithms for Reverberant Artifact Removal Within the Cochlear Implant Stimulus

Overview
Date 2022 Jul 25
PMID 35875863
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Cochlear implant recipients struggle to understand speech in reverberant environments. To restore speech perception, artifacts due to reverberant reflections can be removed from the cochlear implant stimulus by applying a matrix of gain values, a technique referred to as . In this study, two common time-frequency masking strategies are implemented within cochlear implant processing, either introducing complete retention or deletion of stimulus components using a binary mask or continuous attenuation of stimulus components using a ratio mask. Parameters of each masking strategy control the level of attenuation imposed by the gain values. In this study, we perceptually tune the parameters of the masking strategy to determine a balance between speech retention and artifact removal. We measure the intelligibility of reverberant signals mitigated by each strategy with speech recognition testing in normal-hearing listeners using vocoding as a simulation of cochlear implant perception. For both masking strategies, we find parameterizations that maximize the intelligibility of the mitigated signals. At the best-performing parameterizations, binary-masked reverberant signals yield larger intelligibility improvements than ratio-masked signals. The results provide a perceptually optimized objective for the removal of reverberant artifacts from cochlear implant stimuli, facilitating improved speech recognition performance for cochlear implant recipients in reverberant environments.

Citing Articles

Objective intelligibility measurement of reverberant vocoded speech for normal-hearing listeners: Towards facilitating the development of speech enhancement algorithms for cochlear implants.

Shahidi L, Collins L, Mainsah B J Acoust Soc Am. 2024; 155(3):2151-2168.

PMID: 38501923 PMC: 10959555. DOI: 10.1121/10.0025285.

References
1.
Dorman M, Loizou P, Rainey D . Speech intelligibility as a function of the number of channels of stimulation for signal processors using sine-wave and noise-band outputs. J Acoust Soc Am. 1998; 102(4):2403-11. DOI: 10.1121/1.419603. View

2.
McDermott H, McKay C, Vandali A . A new portable sound processor for the University of Melbourne/Nucleus Limited multielectrode cochlear implant. J Acoust Soc Am. 1992; 91(6):3367-71. DOI: 10.1121/1.402826. View

3.
Whitmal N, Poissant S, Freyman R, Helfer K . Speech intelligibility in cochlear implant simulations: Effects of carrier type, interfering noise, and subject experience. J Acoust Soc Am. 2007; 122(4):2376-88. DOI: 10.1121/1.2773993. View

4.
Hazrati O, Sadjadi S, Loizou P, Hansen J . Simultaneous suppression of noise and reverberation in cochlear implants using a ratio masking strategy. J Acoust Soc Am. 2013; 134(5):3759-65. PMC: 3829893. DOI: 10.1121/1.4823839. View

5.
Roman N, Woodruff J . Speech intelligibility in reverberation with ideal binary masking: effects of early reflections and signal-to-noise ratio threshold. J Acoust Soc Am. 2013; 133(3):1707-17. DOI: 10.1121/1.4789895. View