» Articles » PMID: 35875849

Validation of Three-dimensional Digital Model Superimpositions Based on Palatal Structures in Patients with Maximum Anterior Tooth Retraction Following Premolar Extraction

Overview
Journal Korean J Orthod
Date 2022 Jul 25
PMID 35875849
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the superimposition accuracy of digital modes for measuring tooth movement in patients requiring anterior retraction after premolar extraction based on the proposed reference regions.

Methods: Forty patients treated with bilateral maxillary first premolar extraction were divided into two groups: moderate retraction (< 7.0 mm) and maximum retraction (≥ 7.0 mm). Central incisor displacement was measured using cephalometric superimpositions and three-dimensional (3D) digital superimpositions with the 3rd or 4th ruga as the reference point. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test and linear regression analyses were performed to test the significance of the differences and relationships between the two measurement techniques.

Results: In the moderate retraction group, the central incisor anteroposterior displacement values did not differ significantly between 3D digital and cephalometric superimpositions. However, in the maximum-retraction group, significant differences were observed between the anteroposterior displacement evaluated by the 3rd ruga superimposition and cephalometric methods ( < 0.05).

Conclusions: This study demonstrated that 3D digital superimpositions were clinically as reliable as cephalometric superimpositions in assessing tooth movements in patients requiring moderate retraction. However, the reference point should be carefully examined in patients who require maximum retraction.

Citing Articles

Second Versus First Molar Extractions in Class II Division 1 Malocclusion Treatment: A Retrospective Longitudinal Outcome Study into Maxillary Canine, Premolar, and Molar Movement.

Oostenbrink A, Bronkhorst E, Booij J, Dieters A, Ren Y, Kuijpers-Jagtman A J Clin Med. 2025; 14(1.

PMID: 39797316 PMC: 11721531. DOI: 10.3390/jcm14010225.


Analysis of Three-Dimensional Tooth Movement: A Comparative Study Between Digital Dental Models and Craniofacial Models.

Kubota R, Fushima K, Arisaka H Cureus. 2024; 16(8):e67094.

PMID: 39286703 PMC: 11405094. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.67094.


Superimposition of virtual models using palatal rugae and maximum habitual intercuspation.

Holz I, Carvalho F, Almeida R Dental Press J Orthod. 2024; 29(2):e24spe2.

PMID: 38775602 PMC: 11104951. DOI: 10.1590/2177-6709.29.2.e24spe2.


Accuracy and reliability of mandibular digital model superimposition based on the morphological characteristics of vessels in extraction adult patients.

Hu Y, Zheng M, Chen J, Guo C, Chen J BMC Oral Health. 2024; 24(1):125.

PMID: 38267962 PMC: 10809553. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-023-03836-9.

References
1.
Thiruvenkatachari B, Al-Abdallah M, Akram N, Sandler J, OBrien K . Measuring 3-dimensional tooth movement with a 3-dimensional surface laser scanner. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009; 135(4):480-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.03.040. View

2.
Garino F, Garino G . Digital treatment objectives: procedure and clinical application. Prog Orthod. 2004; 5(2):248-58. View

3.
Horton H, Miller J, Gaillard P, Larson B . Technique comparison for efficient orthodontic tooth measurements using digital models. Angle Orthod. 2009; 80(2):254-61. PMC: 8973218. DOI: 10.2319/041709-219.1. View

4.
Chong J, Mohamed A, Pau A . Morphological patterns of the palatal rugae: A review. J Oral Biosci. 2020; 62(3):249-259. DOI: 10.1016/j.job.2020.06.003. View

5.
Keating A, Knox J, Bibb R, Zhurov A . A comparison of plaster, digital and reconstructed study model accuracy. J Orthod. 2008; 35(3):191-201. DOI: 10.1179/146531207225022626. View