» Articles » PMID: 35874107

Design and Development of a Scale for Evaluating the Acceptance of Social Robotics for Older People: The Robot Era Inventory

Overview
Date 2022 Jul 25
PMID 35874107
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Nowadays, several robots have been developed to provide not only companionship to older adults, but also to cooperate with them during health and lifestyle activities. Despite the undeniable wealth of socially assistive robots (SARs), there is an increasing need to customize the tools used for measuring their acceptance in real-life applications.

Methods: Within the Robot-Era project, a scale was developed to understand the degree of acceptance of the robotic platform. A preliminary test with 21 participants was performed to assess the statistical validity of the Robot-Era Inventory (REI) scales.

Results: Based on the criteria observed in the literature, 41 items were developed and grouped in different scales (perceived robot personality, human-robot interaction, perceived benefit, ease of use, and perceived usefulness). The reliability of the Robot-Era Inventory scale was analyzed with Cronbach's alpha, with a mean value of 0.79 (range = 0.61-0.91). Furthermore, the preliminary validity of this scale has been tested by using the correlation analysis with a gold standard, the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) model.

Discussion: The Robot-Era Inventory represents a useful tool that can be easily personalized and included in the assessment of any SARs that cooperate with older people in real environment applications.

Citing Articles

Instruments for Measuring Psychological Dimensions in Human-Robot Interaction: Systematic Review of Psychometric Properties.

Vagnetti R, Camp N, Story M, Ait-Belaid K, Mitra S, Zecca M J Med Internet Res. 2024; 26:e55597.

PMID: 38682783 PMC: 11187516. DOI: 10.2196/55597.

References
1.
Ware Jr J, Kosinski M, Keller S . A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care. 1996; 34(3):220-33. DOI: 10.1097/00005650-199603000-00003. View

2.
Magsamen-Conrad K, Upadhyaya S, Joa C, Dowd J . Bridging the Divide: Using UTAUT to predict multigenerational tablet adoption practices. Comput Human Behav. 2015; 50:186-196. PMC: 4412023. DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2015.03.032. View

3.
Fiore S, Wiltshire T, Lobato E, Jentsch F, Huang W, Axelrod B . Toward understanding social cues and signals in human-robot interaction: effects of robot gaze and proxemic behavior. Front Psychol. 2013; 4:859. PMC: 3842160. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00859. View

4.
Bevilacqua R, Casaccia S, Cortellessa G, Astell A, Lattanzio F, Corsonello A . Coaching Through Technology: A Systematic Review into Efficacy and Effectiveness for the Ageing Population. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020; 17(16). PMC: 7459778. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17165930. View

5.
Fries J . Aging, natural death, and the compression of morbidity. N Engl J Med. 1980; 303(3):130-5. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM198007173030304. View