» Articles » PMID: 35873348

Quality Assessment and Morphological Analysis of Photoplethysmography in Daily Life

Overview
Date 2022 Jul 25
PMID 35873348
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The photoplethysmographic (PPG) signal has been applied in various research fields, with promising results for its future clinical application. However, there are several sources of variability that, if not adequately controlled, can hamper its application in pervasive monitoring contexts. This study assessed and characterized the impact of several sources of variability, such as physical activity, age, sex, and health state on PPG signal quality and PPG waveform parameters (Rise Time, Pulse Amplitude, Pulse Time, Reflection Index, Delta T, and DiastolicAmplitude). We analyzed 31 24 h recordings by as many participants (19 healthy subjects and 12 oncological patients) with a wristband wearable device, selecting a set of PPG pulses labeled with three different quality levels. We implemented a Multinomial Logistic Regression (MLR) model to evaluate the impact of the aforementioned factors on PPG signal quality. We then extracted six parameters only on higher-quality PPG pulses and evaluated the influence of physical activity, age, sex, and health state on these parameters with Generalized Linear Mixed Effects Models (GLMM). We found that physical activity has a detrimental effect on PPG signal quality quality (94% of pulses with good quality when the subject is at rest vs. 9% during intense activity), and that health state affects the percentage of available PPG pulses of the best quality (at rest, 44% for healthy subjects vs. 13% for oncological patients). Most of the extracted parameters are influenced by physical activity and health state, while age significantly impacts two parameters related to arterial stiffness. These results can help expand the awareness that accurate, reliable information extracted from PPG signals can be reached by tackling and modeling different sources of inaccuracy.

Citing Articles

Deep CNN-based detection of cardiac rhythm disorders using PPG signals from wearable devices.

Bulut M, Unal S, Hammad M, Plawiak P PLoS One. 2025; 20(2):e0314154.

PMID: 39937744 PMC: 11819536. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0314154.


The 2023 wearable photoplethysmography roadmap.

Charlton P, Allen J, Bailon R, Baker S, Behar J, Chen F Physiol Meas. 2023; 44(11).

PMID: 37494945 PMC: 10686289. DOI: 10.1088/1361-6579/acead2.


Artificial Intelligence for Automatic Pain Assessment: Research Methods and Perspectives.

Cascella M, Schiavo D, Cuomo A, Ottaiano A, Perri F, Patrone R Pain Res Manag. 2023; 2023:6018736.

PMID: 37416623 PMC: 10322534. DOI: 10.1155/2023/6018736.


Wearable Multisensor Ring-Shaped Probe for Assessing Stress and Blood Oxygenation: Design and Preliminary Measurements.

Valenti S, Volpes G, Parisi A, Peri D, Lee J, Faes L Biosensors (Basel). 2023; 13(4).

PMID: 37185535 PMC: 10136507. DOI: 10.3390/bios13040460.

References
1.
Mayampurath A, Volchenboum S, Sanchez-Pinto L . Using photoplethysmography data to estimate heart rate variability and its association with organ dysfunction in pediatric oncology patients. NPJ Digit Med. 2019; 1:29. PMC: 6550162. DOI: 10.1038/s41746-018-0038-0. View

2.
Lin W, Verma V, Lee M, Lai C . Activity Monitoring with a Wrist-Worn, Accelerometer-Based Device. Micromachines (Basel). 2018; 9(9). PMC: 6187390. DOI: 10.3390/mi9090450. View

3.
Schmidt P, Reiss A, Durichen R, Van Laerhoven K . Wearable-Based Affect Recognition-A Review. Sensors (Basel). 2019; 19(19). PMC: 6806301. DOI: 10.3390/s19194079. View

4.
Seshadri D, Li R, Voos J, Rowbottom J, Alfes C, Zorman C . Wearable sensors for monitoring the physiological and biochemical profile of the athlete. NPJ Digit Med. 2019; 2:72. PMC: 6646404. DOI: 10.1038/s41746-019-0150-9. View

5.
Elgendi M, Fletcher R, Liang Y, Howard N, Lovell N, Abbott D . The use of photoplethysmography for assessing hypertension. NPJ Digit Med. 2019; 2:60. PMC: 6594942. DOI: 10.1038/s41746-019-0136-7. View