» Articles » PMID: 35867727

Understanding No-show Behaviour for Cervical Cancer Screening Appointments Among Hard-to-reach Women in Bogotá, Colombia: A Mixed-methods Approach

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2022 Jul 22
PMID 35867727
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The global burden of cervical cancer remains a concern and higher early mortality rates are associated with poverty and limited health education. However, screening programs continue to face implementation challenges, especially in developing country contexts. In this study, we use a mixed-methods approach to understand the reasons for no-show behaviour for cervical cancer screening appointments among hard-to-reach low-income women in Bogotá, Colombia. In the quantitative phase, individual attendance probabilities are predicted using administrative records from an outreach program (N = 23384) using both LASSO regression and Random Forest methods. In the qualitative phase, semi-structured interviews are analysed to understand patient perspectives (N = 60). Both inductive and deductive coding are used to identify first-order categories and content analysis is facilitated using the Framework method. Quantitative analysis shows that younger patients and those living in zones of poverty are more likely to miss their appointments. Likewise, appointments scheduled on Saturdays, during the school vacation periods or with lead times longer than 10 days have higher no-show risk. Qualitative data shows that patients find it hard to navigate the service delivery process, face barriers accessing the health system and hold negative beliefs about cervical cytology.

Citing Articles

Impact of the universal health insurance benefits on cervical cancer mortality in Colombia.

Lewis A, Hernandez D, Garces-Palacio I, Soliman A BMC Health Serv Res. 2024; 24(1):693.

PMID: 38822370 PMC: 11143589. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-024-10979-0.

References
1.
Gatumo M, Gacheri S, Sayed A, Scheibe A . Women's knowledge and attitudes related to cervical cancer and cervical cancer screening in Isiolo and Tharaka Nithi counties, Kenya: a cross-sectional study. BMC Cancer. 2018; 18(1):745. PMC: 6052645. DOI: 10.1186/s12885-018-4642-9. View

2.
Bermedo-Carrasco S, Waldner C . The role of socio-demographic factors in premature cervical cancer mortality in Colombia. BMC Public Health. 2016; 16:981. PMC: 5024424. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-016-3645-1. View

3.
Sandelowski M . Combining qualitative and quantitative sampling, data collection, and analysis techniques in mixed-method studies. Res Nurs Health. 2000; 23(3):246-55. DOI: 10.1002/1098-240x(200006)23:3<246::aid-nur9>3.0.co;2-h. View

4.
Pilleron S, Cabasag C, Ferlay J, Bray F, Luciani S, Almonte M . Cervical cancer burden in Latin America and the Caribbean: Where are we?. Int J Cancer. 2020; 147(6):1638-1648. DOI: 10.1002/ijc.32956. View

5.
Black E, Hyslop F, Richmond R . Barriers and facilitators to uptake of cervical cancer screening among women in Uganda: a systematic review. BMC Womens Health. 2019; 19(1):108. PMC: 6688246. DOI: 10.1186/s12905-019-0809-z. View