» Articles » PMID: 35867687

Association of Compassion and Empathy with Prosocial Health Behaviors and Attitudes in a Pandemic

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2022 Jul 22
PMID 35867687
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This investigation examined how dispositional compassion and empathy were associated with prosocial behaviors and attitudes in the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Every two weeks from March 22 to June 15, 2020, we fielded a survey to a new cohort of adults in the U.S. Compassion related to whether one stayed home to protect others, more hours spent staying home and distancing from others, and more frequent mask wearing in public, in the past two weeks. Compassion also related to greater perceived ability to help others who were negatively affected. Empathy related to more endorsement of understanding others' fear of COVID-19, and less endorsement of the view that others were overreacting to COVID-19. There was an interaction between empathy and political ideology, suggesting that empathy may matter for understanding others' fear among those with more conservative-leaning beliefs. Empathy also related to greater understanding that sheltering-in-place helps prevent the spread of COVID-19. Findings suggest that messaging and interventions to increase compassion and empathy may promote public health behaviors during a pandemic regardless of political orientation. Targeting empathy may be one way to reach individuals with more conservative political beliefs, and it is important to use an evidence-based approach accounting for political party differences in motivated reasoning.

Citing Articles

Personality factors and pandemic-related behaviors.

Williamson J Front Psychol. 2024; 15:1389672.

PMID: 39144602 PMC: 11321959. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1389672.


Predicting health behaviors during the COVID-19 pandemic: A longitudinal study.

Wollast R, Schmitz M, Bigot A, Brisbois M, Luminet O PLoS One. 2024; 19(3):e0299868.

PMID: 38489308 PMC: 10942062. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0299868.


To respond or not to respond: exploring empathy-related psychological and structural brain differences between placebo analgesia responders and non-responders.

Hartmann H, Banwinkler M, Riva F, Lamm C Front Psychol. 2023; 14:1257522.

PMID: 37849473 PMC: 10577216. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1257522.


Compassion as a tool for allyship and anti-racism.

Karnaze M, Rajagopalan R, Eyler L, Bloss C Front Psychol. 2023; 14:1143384.

PMID: 37113123 PMC: 10127679. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1143384.


Eliciting empathetic drives to prosocial behavior during stressful events.

Grignoli N, Filipponi C, Petrocchi S Front Psychol. 2022; 13:963544.

PMID: 36337517 PMC: 9632620. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.963544.


References
1.
Allcott H, Boxell L, Conway J, Gentzkow M, Thaler M, Yang D . Polarization and public health: Partisan differences in social distancing during the coronavirus pandemic. J Public Econ. 2020; 191:104254. PMC: 7409721. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2020.104254. View

2.
Hart P, Chinn S, Soroka S . Politicization and Polarization in COVID-19 News Coverage. Sci Commun. 2024; 42(5):679-697. PMC: 7447862. DOI: 10.1177/1075547020950735. View

3.
Sened H, Lavidor M, Lazarus G, Bar-Kalifa E, Rafaeli E, Ickes W . Empathic accuracy and relationship satisfaction: A meta-analytic review. J Fam Psychol. 2017; 31(6):742-752. DOI: 10.1037/fam0000320. View

4.
Decety J, Yoder K . Empathy and motivation for justice: Cognitive empathy and concern, but not emotional empathy, predict sensitivity to injustice for others. Soc Neurosci. 2015; 11(1):1-14. PMC: 4592359. DOI: 10.1080/17470919.2015.1029593. View

5.
Singer T, Klimecki O . Empathy and compassion. Curr Biol. 2014; 24(18):R875-R878. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2014.06.054. View