» Articles » PMID: 35865933

Genomic Diversity, Virulence Gene, and Prophage Arrays of Bovine and Human Shiga Toxigenic and Enteropathogenic Strains Isolated in Hungary

Overview
Journal Front Microbiol
Specialty Microbiology
Date 2022 Jul 22
PMID 35865933
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

belonging to the enterohemorrhagic (EHEC), Shiga toxin-producing (STEC) and atypical enteropathogenic (aEPEC) pathotypes are significant foodborne zoonotic pathogens posing serious health risks, with healthy cattle as their main reservoir. A representative sampling of Hungarian cattle farms during 2017-2018 yielded a prevalence of 6.5 and 5.8% for STEC and aEPEC out of 309 samples. The draft genomes of twelve STEC (of them 9 EHEC) and four aEPEC of bovine origin were determined. For comparative purposes, we also included 3 EHEC and 2 aEPEC strains of human origin, as well four commensal isolates and one extraintestinal pathogenic (ExPEC) obtained from animals in a final set of 26 strains for a WGS-based analysis. Apart from key virulence genes, these isolates harbored several additional virulence genes with arrays characteristic for the site of isolation. The most frequent insertion site of Shiga toxin encoding prophages was for the Stx1 prophage and and for Stx2. For O157:H7 strains, the locus of enterocyte effacement pathogenicity island was present at the site, with integration at for other serotypes, and in the case of O26:H11 strains. Several LEE-negative STEC and aEPEC as well as commensal isolates carried additional prophages, with an average of ten prophage regions per isolate. Comparative phylogenomic analysis showed no clear separation between bovine and human lineages among the isolates characterized in the current study. Similarities in virulence gene arrays and close phylogenetic relations of bovine and human isolates underline the zoonotic potential of bovine aEPEC and STEC and emphasize the need for frequent monitoring of these pathogens in livestock.

Citing Articles

Overview of pathogenic Escherichia coli, with a focus on Shiga toxin-producing serotypes, global outbreaks (1982-2024) and food safety criteria.

Alhadlaq M, Aljurayyad O, Almansour A, Al-Akeel S, Alzahrani K, Alsalman S Gut Pathog. 2024; 16(1):57.

PMID: 39370525 PMC: 11457481. DOI: 10.1186/s13099-024-00641-9.

References
1.
Toth I, Schmidt H, Kardos G, Lancz Z, Creuzburg K, Damjanova I . Virulence genes and molecular typing of different groups of Escherichia coli O157 strains in cattle. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2009; 75(19):6282-91. PMC: 2753057. DOI: 10.1128/AEM.00873-09. View

2.
Jores J, Rumer L, Wieler L . Impact of the locus of enterocyte effacement pathogenicity island on the evolution of pathogenic Escherichia coli. Int J Med Microbiol. 2004; 294(2-3):103-13. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmm.2004.06.024. View

3.
Hayashi T, Makino K, Ohnishi M, Kurokawa K, Ishii K, Yokoyama K . Complete genome sequence of enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157:H7 and genomic comparison with a laboratory strain K-12. DNA Res. 2001; 8(1):11-22. DOI: 10.1093/dnares/8.1.11. View

4.
Scheutz F, Teel L, Beutin L, Pierard D, Buvens G, Karch H . Multicenter evaluation of a sequence-based protocol for subtyping Shiga toxins and standardizing Stx nomenclature. J Clin Microbiol. 2012; 50(9):2951-63. PMC: 3421821. DOI: 10.1128/JCM.00860-12. View

5.
Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich A, Dvorkin M, Kulikov A . SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol. 2012; 19(5):455-77. PMC: 3342519. DOI: 10.1089/cmb.2012.0021. View