» Articles » PMID: 35864478

Association of Frailty and Functional Recovery in an Acute Care for Elders Unit: a Prospective Observational Study

Overview
Journal BMC Geriatr
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Geriatrics
Date 2022 Jul 21
PMID 35864478
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Evidence on the effects of Acute Care for Elders (ACE) units in frail older adults remains limited. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the effects of the ACE unit on functional outcomes in frail older adults.

Methods: In this prospective observational study, we enrolled 114 consecutive patients aged 65 years and older admitted to the ACE unit for acute medical conditions between October 2019 and September 2020. The FRAIL scale (5-question assessment of fatigue, resistance, aerobic capacity, illnesses, and loss of weight) was used to classify the patients into three groups: robust (score = 0, n = 28), prefrail (score = 1-2, n = 57), and frail (score = 3-5, n = 29). The primary outcome was the activities of daily living (ADL) measured by the Barthel Index at admission and before discharge. Paired sample t-test was employed to determine the difference in ADL. Multiple linear regression analysis, with adjustment for covariates, was conducted to examine the association between frailty status and change in ADL.

Results: Among 114 patients enrolled (mean age, 79.8 ± 8.1 years; mean length of stay, 6.4 ± 5.6 days), 77 (67.5%) were female. ADL at admission (60.3 ± 31.9) and before discharge (83.7 ± 21.6) were significantly different (P < 0.001). After covariates adjustment, a significant association between frailty status and change in ADL was found (prefrail vs. robust: β = 9.0, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.3-17.6, P = 0.04; frail vs. robust: β = 13.4, 95% CI 2.7-24.0, P = 0.01).

Conclusions: Older adults with frailty experienced functional improvement after admission to the ACE unit. Prefrail and frail groups were associated with a more significant change in ADL between admission and discharge compared to the robust group.

Citing Articles

Screening of Hospitalized Elderly Patients for Frailty and Associated Co-morbid Conditions in Western Gujarat in India.

Makwana N, Ram R, Yogesh M J Family Med Prim Care. 2024; 13(3):890-895.

PMID: 38736826 PMC: 11086788. DOI: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1176_23.


Research progress in the hospitalization-associated disability among elderly patients.

Wu S, Zhao Y, Ning H, Hu H, Feng H Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2023; 48(3):455-462.

PMID: 37164929 PMC: 10930072. DOI: 10.11817/j.issn.1672-7347.2023.220333.


Development and validation of retrospective electronic frailty index using operational data of aged care homes.

Sarwar T, Jimeno Yepes A, Zhang X, Chan J, Hudson I, Evans S BMC Geriatr. 2022; 22(1):922.

PMID: 36451137 PMC: 9714152. DOI: 10.1186/s12877-022-03616-0.

References
1.
MAHONEY F, BARTHEL D . FUNCTIONAL EVALUATION: THE BARTHEL INDEX. Md State Med J. 1965; 14:61-5. View

2.
Lee W, Liu L, Peng L, Lin M, Chen L . Comparisons of sarcopenia defined by IWGS and EWGSOP criteria among older people: results from the I-Lan longitudinal aging study. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2013; 14(7):528.e1-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.jamda.2013.03.019. View

3.
Kawryshanker S, Raymond W, Ingram K, Inderjeeth C . Effect of Frailty on Functional Gain, Resource Utilisation, and Discharge Destination: An Observational Prospective Study in a GEM Ward. Curr Gerontol Geriatr Res. 2014; 2014:357857. PMC: 3948590. DOI: 10.1155/2014/357857. View

4.
Sousa-Santos A, Amaral T . Differences in handgrip strength protocols to identify sarcopenia and frailty - a systematic review. BMC Geriatr. 2017; 17(1):238. PMC: 5644254. DOI: 10.1186/s12877-017-0625-y. View

5.
Ensrud K, Ewing S, Cawthon P, Fink H, Taylor B, Cauley J . A comparison of frailty indexes for the prediction of falls, disability, fractures, and mortality in older men. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2009; 57(3):492-8. PMC: 2861353. DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2009.02137.x. View