» Articles » PMID: 35862370

Translation and Performance of the Finnish Diabetes Risk Score for Detecting Undiagnosed Diabetes and Dysglycaemia in the Indonesian Population

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2022 Jul 21
PMID 35862370
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

A diabetes risk score cannot directly be translated and applied in different populations, and its performance should be evaluated in the target population. This study aimed to translate the Finnish Diabetes Risk Score (FINDRISC) instrument and compare its performance with the modified version for detecting undiagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and dysglycaemia among the Indonesian adult population. Forward and backward translations were performed and followed by cultural adaptation. In total, 1,403 participants were recruited. The FINDRISC-Bahasa Indonesia (FINDRISC-BI) was scored according to the original FINDRISC instrument, while a Modified FINDRISC-BI was analyzed using a specific body mass index and waist circumference classification for Indonesians. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, sensitivity, specificity, and the optimal cut-offs of both instruments were estimated. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for detecting undiagnosed T2DM was 0.73 (0.67-0.78) for the FINDRISC-BI with an optimal cut-off score of ≥9 (sensitivity = 63.0%; specificity = 67.3%) and 0.72 (0.67-0.78) for the Modified FINDRISC-BI with an optimal cut-off score of ≥11 (sensitivity = 59.8%; specificity = 74.9%). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for detecting dysglycaemia was 0.72 (0.69-0.75) for the FINDRISC-BI instrument with an optimal cut-off score of ≥8 (sensitivity = 66.4%; specificity = 67.0%), and 0.72 (0.69-0.75) for the Modified FINDRISC-BI instrument with an optimal cut-off score ≥9 (sensitivity = 63.8%; specificity = 67.6%). The Indonesian version of the FINDRISC instrument has acceptable diagnostic accuracy for screening people with undiagnosed T2DM or dysglycaemia in Indonesia. Modifying the body mass index and waist circumference classifications in the Modified FINDRISC-BI results in a similar diagnostic accuracy; however, the Modified FINDRISC-BI has a higher optimal cut-off point than the FINDRISC-BI. People with an above optimal cut-off score are suggested to take a further blood glucose test.

Citing Articles

Accuracy of the Modified Finnish Diabetes Risk Score (Modified FINDRISC) for detecting metabolic syndrome: Findings from the Indonesian national health survey.

Cahyaningsih I, Rokhman M, Sudikno , Postma M, van der Schans J PLoS One. 2025; 20(2):e0314824.

PMID: 39937716 PMC: 11819590. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0314824.


FINDRISC modified for Cuba as a tool for the detection of prediabetes and undiagnosed diabetes in cuban population.

Cabrera-Rode E, Diaz-Diaz O, Orlandi Gonzalez N, Ronald M Rev Peru Med Exp Salud Publica. 2025; 41(4):351-364.

PMID: 39936758 PMC: 11797583. DOI: 10.17843/rpmesp.2024.414.14138.


Can social media encourage diabetes self-screenings? A randomized controlled trial with Indonesian Facebook users.

Fritz M, Grimm M, Weber I, Yom-Tov E, Praditya B NPJ Digit Med. 2024; 7(1):245.

PMID: 39271847 PMC: 11399376. DOI: 10.1038/s41746-024-01246-x.


Impaired health-related quality of life due to elevated risk of developing diabetes: A cross-sectional study in Indonesia.

Rokhman M, Arifin B, Broggi B, Verhaar A, Zulkarnain Z, Satibi S PLoS One. 2023; 18(12):e0295934.

PMID: 38117810 PMC: 10732360. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0295934.


Effective questionnaire-based prediction models for type 2 diabetes across several ethnicities: a model development and validation study.

Kokkorakis M, Folkertsma P, van Dam S, Sirotin N, Taheri S, Chagoury O EClinicalMedicine. 2023; 64:102235.

PMID: 37936659 PMC: 10626169. DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.102235.


References
1.
. 2. Classification and Diagnosis of Diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2016; 40(Suppl 1):S11-S24. DOI: 10.2337/dc17-S005. View

2.
Barber S, Davies M, Khunti K, Gray L . Risk assessment tools for detecting those with pre-diabetes: a systematic review. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2014; 105(1):1-13. DOI: 10.1016/j.diabres.2014.03.007. View

3.
. Standards of medical care in diabetes--2009. Diabetes Care. 2009; 32 Suppl 1:S13-61. PMC: 2613589. DOI: 10.2337/dc09-S013. View

4.
Grace A, Chan E, Giallauria F, Graham P, Smart N . Clinical outcomes and glycaemic responses to different aerobic exercise training intensities in type II diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2017; 16(1):37. PMC: 5351065. DOI: 10.1186/s12933-017-0518-6. View

5.
Boule N, Kenny G, Haddad E, Wells G, Sigal R . Meta-analysis of the effect of structured exercise training on cardiorespiratory fitness in Type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabetologia. 2003; 46(8):1071-81. DOI: 10.1007/s00125-003-1160-2. View