» Articles » PMID: 35860196

Is It Necessary to Remove the Implants After Fixation of Thoracolumbar and Lumbar Burst Fractures Without Fusion? A Retrospective Cohort Study of Elderly Patients

Overview
Journal Front Surg
Specialty General Surgery
Date 2022 Jul 21
PMID 35860196
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: Fractures of the thoracolumbar spine are the most common fractures of the spinal column. This retrospective cohort study aimed to determine whether it is necessary to remove implants of patients aged over 65 years after the fixation of thoracolumbar and lumbar burst fractures without fusion.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 107 consecutive patients aged ≥65 years without neurological deficits, who underwent non-fusion short posterior segmental fixation for thoracolumbar or lumbar burst fractures. Outcome measures included the visual analog score (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), residual symptoms, complications, and imaging parameters. Patients were divided into groups A (underwent implant removal) and B (implant retention) and were examined clinically at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively and annually thereafter, with a final follow-up at 48.5 months.

Results: Overall, 96 patients with a mean age of 69.4 (range, 65-77) years were analyzed. At the latest follow-up, no significant differences were observed in functional outcomes and radiological parameters between both groups, except in the local motion range (LMR) ( = 0.006). Similarly, between preimplant removal and the latest follow-up in group A, significant differences were found only in LMR ( < 0.001). Two patients experienced screw breakage without clinical symptoms. Significant differences were only found in operation time, blood loss, ODI, and fracture type between minimally invasive group and open group.

Conclusions: Similar radiological and functional outcomes were observed in elderly patients, regardless of implant removal. Implant removal may not be necessary after weighing the risks and benefits for elderly patients. Patients should be informed about the possibility of implant breakage and accelerating degeneration of adjacent segments in advance.

Citing Articles

A practical method for the retrieval of tulip-head polyaxial pedicle screw by reusing the rod in revision and implants removal surgery: introduction of technique and evaluation of clinical outcomes.

Zhang Y, Song J, Lu Y, Yi M, Xu X, Ding L BMC Surg. 2023; 23(1):152.

PMID: 37280570 PMC: 10243053. DOI: 10.1186/s12893-023-02063-x.


The Necessity of Implant Removal after Fixation of Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures-A Systematic Review.

Wang X, Wu X, Zhang Y, Zhu Z, Jiang J, Li G J Clin Med. 2023; 12(6).

PMID: 36983216 PMC: 10057639. DOI: 10.3390/jcm12062213.

References
1.
Liu C, Wang S, Lin H, Kao H, Yu W, Lo W . AO fixateur interne in treating burst fractures of the thoracolumbar spine. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi (Taipei). 1999; 62(9):619-25. View

2.
Lee Y, Selby M, Zotti M, Roy D, Freeman B . Minimally invasive stabilization for thoracolumbar and lumbar fractures: a comparative study with short segment open Schanz screw constructs. J Spine Surg. 2019; 5(1):13-18. PMC: 6465457. DOI: 10.21037/jss.2019.01.06. View

3.
Hoppe S, Keel M . Pedicle screw augmentation in osteoporotic spine: indications, limitations and technical aspects. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2016; 43(1):3-8. DOI: 10.1007/s00068-016-0750-x. View

4.
Tian N, Wu Y, Zhang X, Wu X, Chi Y, Mao F . Fusion versus nonfusion for surgically treated thoracolumbar burst fractures: a meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2013; 8(5):e63995. PMC: 3660321. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0063995. View

5.
Palmisani M, Gasbarrini A, Barbanti Brodano G, De Iure F, Cappuccio M, Boriani L . Minimally invasive percutaneous fixation in the treatment of thoracic and lumbar spine fractures. Eur Spine J. 2009; 18 Suppl 1:71-4. PMC: 2899613. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-009-0989-6. View