» Articles » PMID: 35857199

Outcomes of Abbreviated MRI (Ab-MRI) for Women of Any Breast Cancer Risk and Breast Density in a Community Academic Setting

Overview
Journal Ann Surg Oncol
Publisher Springer
Specialty Oncology
Date 2022 Jul 20
PMID 35857199
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Abbreviated magnetic resonance imaging (Ab-MRI) has been evaluated for elevated breast cancer risk or dense breasts but has not been evaluated across all risk profiles.

Methods: Patients selected underwent Ab-MRI from February 2020 to September 2021. Women were older than aged 30 years, up to date with screening mammography, and paid $299 cash.

Results: A total of 93 patients were identified with a mean age of 52 years; 92.5% were Caucasian, 0% black, and 97.9% were from high socioeconomic status. Mean Gail score was 14.2, and 83.3% had a lifetime risk of breast cancer <20%. Reasons for Ab-MRI: dense breasts (36.6%); family history (24.7%); palpable mass (12.9%). Providers ordering: OBGYN (49.5%); breast surgeon (39.1%); primary care (6.6%). Thirteen biopsies (14%) detected one breast cancer. 31.1% had a change in follow-up screening: 58.6% 6-month MRI, 20.7% 6-month mammogram, and 10.3% 6-month ultrasound. Negative predictive value was 100% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 95-100%, p < 0.0001). Sensitivity was 100% (95% CI: 2.5-100%, p < 0.0001), and specificity was 87% (95% CI: 78.3-93.1%, p < 0.0001) compared with 77.6% and 98.8% for mammography. Only one cancer was detected: cost of $27,807 plus cost of 13 MRI or ultrasound (US)-guided biopsies and additional follow-up imaging. Historically 20% of abnormalities detected on full MRI are malignant; however, 7.7% of ab-MRI abnormalities were malignant CONCLUSIONS: One third of women were recommended a change in follow-up, which predominantly included a 6-month MRI. Ab-MRI may introduce average risk women to unnecessary follow-up and increased biopsies with a lower cancer detection rate. Ab-MRI should be evaluated closely before implementation.

Citing Articles

23rd Annual Meeting of the American Society of Breast Surgeons: Back to In-Person Scientific Exploration.

Fisher C, Teshome M, Blair S Ann Surg Oncol. 2022; 29(10):6087-6089.

PMID: 35902494 PMC: 9333076. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-12263-z.

References
1.
Loberg M, Lousdal M, Bretthauer M, Kalager M . Benefits and harms of mammography screening. Breast Cancer Res. 2015; 17:63. PMC: 4415291. DOI: 10.1186/s13058-015-0525-z. View

2.
Leithner D, Wengert G, Helbich T, Thakur S, Ochoa-Albiztegui R, Morris E . Clinical role of breast MRI now and going forward. Clin Radiol. 2017; 73(8):700-714. PMC: 6788454. DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2017.10.021. View

3.
Kuhl C, Schrading S . More Is More: Semiannual Breast MRI Screening in BRCA1 Mutation Carriers. Clin Cancer Res. 2018; 25(6):1693-1695. DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-3145. View

4.
Mango V, Goel A, Mema E, Kwak E, Ha R . Breast MRI screening for average-risk women: A monte carlo simulation cost-benefit analysis. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2019; 49(7):e216-e221. PMC: 7478848. DOI: 10.1002/jmri.26334. View

5.
Kuhl C, Schrading S, Strobel K, Schild H, Hilgers R, Bieling H . Abbreviated breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI): first postcontrast subtracted images and maximum-intensity projection-a novel approach to breast cancer screening with MRI. J Clin Oncol. 2014; 32(22):2304-10. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2013.52.5386. View