Patient Selection for Spinal Cord Stimulation: The Importance of an Integrated Assessment of Clinical and Psychosocial Factors
Overview
Neurology
Psychiatry
Authors
Affiliations
Background: A previously developed educational e-health tool considers both clinical and psychosocial factors when selecting patients with chronic pain for spinal cord stimulation (SCS). The validity of the composite recommendations was evaluated in a retrospective study, demonstrating a strong relationship with patient outcomes after SCS.
Methods: An additional retrospective analysis was performed to determine the added value of a psychosocial evaluation as part of the decision-making process on SCS. Data concerned 482 patients who were considered for SCS in 2018-2019. The analysis focused on the relationship between the different layers of the tool recommendations (clinical, psychosocial, composite) with trial results and patient outcomes at 6 months after SCS. Of the initial study population, 381 patients underwent SCS and had follow-up data on at least one of three pain-related outcome measures.
Results: Pain improvement was observed in 76% of the patients for whom SCS was strongly recommended based on merely the clinical aspects. This percentage varied by the level of psychosocial problems and ranged from 86% in patients without any compromising psychosocial factors to 60% in those with severe problems. Similarly, the severity of psychosocial problems affected trial results in patients for whom SCS was either recommended or strongly recommended.
Conclusions: The strong relationship between psychosocial factors embedded in the SCS e-health tool and patient outcomes supports an integrated and multidisciplinary approach in the selection of patients for SCS. The educational e-health tool, combining both clinical and psychosocial aspects, is believed to be helpful for further education and implementation of this approach.
Significance Statement: This study confirms the relevance of the psychosocial factors embedded in the educational SCS e-health tool (https://scstool.org/). The strong relationship between the severity of psychosocial factors with patient outcomes supports conducting a comprehensive psychological and behavioural assessment when determining the eligibility of patients for SCS.
Neuromodulation in chronic pain management: addressing persistent doubts in spinal cord stimulation.
Lo Bianco G, Al-Kaisy A, Natoli S, Abd-Elsayed A, Matis G, Papa A J Anesth Analg Crit Care. 2025; 5(1):3.
PMID: 39762994 PMC: 11705683. DOI: 10.1186/s44158-024-00219-6.
Bastiaens F, van Hooff M, Bruaset I, van den Eede E, Maandag N, Kurt E Eur J Pain. 2025; 29(2):e4780.
PMID: 39757549 PMC: 11701354. DOI: 10.1002/ejp.4780.
De Negri P, Paz-Solis J, Rigoard P, Raoul S, Kallewaard J, Gulve A Interv Pain Med. 2024; 2(3):100263.
PMID: 39238903 PMC: 11372901. DOI: 10.1016/j.inpm.2023.100263.
Goree J, Payakachat N, Byers L, Smith G, Shah J, Stephens K Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2024; 49(11):793-799.
PMID: 38388016 PMC: 11671871. DOI: 10.1136/rapm-2023-104962.
Duarte R, Houten R, Nevitt S, Brookes M, Bell J, Earle J Front Pain Res (Lausanne). 2022; 3:974904.
PMID: 36147037 PMC: 9486155. DOI: 10.3389/fpain.2022.974904.