» Articles » PMID: 35855201

Clinical Significance of Radiologically Detected Small Indeterminate Extra-Mammary Lesions in Breast Cancer Patients

Overview
Date 2022 Jul 20
PMID 35855201
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: Patients with breast cancer who have indeterminate extra-mammary lesions, for example in lung, liver or bone, without other metastatic lesions pose a clinical dilemma regarding subsequent management. This study aimed to investigate the prevalence, characteristics and outcomes of such lesions detected on initial staging imaging, and address the clinical significance of these incidental findings.

Materials And Methods: Medical records of patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer who underwent computed tomography scans and bone scintigraphy between January 1, 2015 and June 30, 2021 were reviewed. Patients with indeterminate extra-mammary lesions on imaging were included. Patients with obvious metastatic disease were excluded. Lesion characteristics, breast cancer staging, duration of follow-up and natural history of disease progression were analysed.

Results: The study included 52 patients with indeterminate lesions on pre-operative imaging. The median follow-up duration was 14 (range: 6-41) months. The most common site of occurrence of indeterminate lesions was the lung (60.9%) followed by the liver (26.1%). Forty-six had lesions that remained stable (88.5%), while six (11.5%) had progression to metastatic disease. Out of these six, only two (3.8%) developed metastasis in the same site as the original indeterminate lesion, whereas the remaining four developed metastases in other sites.

Conclusion: Patients with breast malignancy found to have indeterminate extra-mammary lesions without obvious distant metastasis on initial staging scans are associated with a small risk of subsequently developing metastatic disease. Although most of these lesions remain quiescent, surveillance imaging is recommended because a small but significant proportion of patients with such lesions eventually harbour actual metastatic disease.

Citing Articles

Determining the Need for Metastatic Staging in Patients with Bilateral Breast Cancers.

Alcantara V, Chan S, Wong F, Allen J, Lim G Curr Oncol. 2024; 31(4):1936-1946.

PMID: 38668048 PMC: 11048779. DOI: 10.3390/curroncol31040145.


Is Metastatic Staging Needed for All Patients with Synchronous Bilateral Breast Cancers?.

Lim G, Hoo J, Shin Y, Choo R, Wong F, Allen J Cancers (Basel). 2024; 16(1).

PMID: 38201445 PMC: 10777992. DOI: 10.3390/cancers16010017.

References
1.
Hann L, Lui D, Shi W, Bach A, Selland D, Castiel M . Adnexal masses in women with breast cancer: US findings with clinical and histopathologic correlation. Radiology. 2000; 216(1):242-7. DOI: 10.1148/radiology.216.1.r00jl15242. View

2.
DeSantis C, Bray F, Ferlay J, Lortet-Tieulent J, Anderson B, Jemal A . International Variation in Female Breast Cancer Incidence and Mortality Rates. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2015; 24(10):1495-506. DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-15-0535. View

3.
Johnson R, Chien F, Bleyer A . Incidence of breast cancer with distant involvement among women in the United States, 1976 to 2009. JAMA. 2013; 309(8):800-5. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2013.776. View

4.
Smid M, Wang Y, Zhang Y, Sieuwerts A, Yu J, Klijn J . Subtypes of breast cancer show preferential site of relapse. Cancer Res. 2008; 68(9):3108-14. DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-5644. View

5.
Abikhzer G, Srour S, Fried G, Drumea K, Kozlener E, Frenkel A . Prospective comparison of whole-body bone SPECT and sodium 18F-fluoride PET in the detection of bone metastases from breast cancer. Nucl Med Commun. 2016; 37(11):1160-8. DOI: 10.1097/MNM.0000000000000568. View