» Articles » PMID: 35855150

A Case of Symptomatic Carotid Artery Occlusion After Aortic Arch Replacement Treated with Carotid-carotid Crossover Bypass

Overview
Journal Surg Neurol Int
Specialty Neurology
Date 2022 Jul 20
PMID 35855150
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Symptomatic common carotid artery (CCA) occlusion is rare and its treatment remains unestablished. Although cases of subclavian-to-carotid bypass have been reported, very few cases of carotid-tocarotid crossover bypass have been reported, despite its advantages. We report a case of Riles type 1A symptomatic CCA occlusion after aortic arch replacement that was treated with carotid-to-carotid crossover bypass with favorable outcomes.

Case Description: A 65-year-old woman with a history of hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes, and total arch replacement for thoracic aortic aneurysm was admitted to our hospital with a complaint of the right hemiparesis and motor aphasia. Head magnetic resonance imaging revealed a fresh infarction in the left cerebral hemisphere. Cervical computed tomography (CT) angiography revealed left CCA occlusion. Thoracic CT angiography showed severe stenosis of the left subclavian artery. SPECT showed a general decrease in blood flow in the left cerebral hemisphere. We performed a carotid-to-carotid crossover bypass with a synthetic graft that was passed through the subcutaneous tunnel. First, the right carotid artery-synthetic graft end-to-side anastomosis was performed. Subsequently, we performed synthetic graft-left CCA end-to-side anastomosis. The postoperative course was uneventful. Cervical computed tomography angiography showed perfect patency of the crossover bypass. The patient recovered almost completely and was independently performing daily activities.

Conclusion: Carotid-to-carotid crossover bypass is a durable treatment for symptomatic CCA occlusion. Further studies are needed to compare its outcomes with those of other methods and to confirm our findings with larger sample size.

Citing Articles

Cerebrovascular implications of takayasu arteritis: a review.

Samaan M, Abramyan A, Sundararajan S, Nourollah-Zadeh E, Sun H, Nanda A Neuroradiology. 2024; 67(1):125-136.

PMID: 39377926 PMC: 11802594. DOI: 10.1007/s00234-024-03472-2.

References
1.
Hiu T, Kitagawa N, Suyama K, Nagata I . Progressing takayasu arteritis successfully treated by common carotid-internal carotid crossover bypass grafting: technical case report. Neurosurgery. 2008; 62(5):E1178-9. DOI: 10.1227/01.neu.0000325887.07657.25. View

2.
Ozsvath K, Roddy S, Darling 3rd R, Byrne J, Kreienberg P, Choi D . Carotid-carotid crossover bypass: is it a durable procedure?. J Vasc Surg. 2003; 37(3):582-5. DOI: 10.1067/mva.2003.128. View

3.
Klonaris C, Kouvelos G, Kafeza M, Koutsoumpelis A, Katsargyris A, Tsigris C . Common carotid artery occlusion treatment: revealing a gap in the current guidelines. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2013; 46(3):291-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2013.06.006. View

4.
Li Z, Chen C, Ling C, He H, Luo L, Li H . Surgical procedures including carotid-carotid crossover bypass and ring-stripping hybrid operation for Rile's type 1A common carotid artery occlusion: an experience of 6 cases. Ann Transl Med. 2020; 8(7):439. PMC: 7210149. DOI: 10.21037/atm.2020.03.177. View

5.
Hsu J, Tsai H . Endovascular recanalization of common carotid artery Total occlusion: two case reports and literature review. CVIR Endovasc. 2020; 3(1):6. PMC: 6966340. DOI: 10.1186/s42155-020-0097-6. View