» Articles » PMID: 35854872

The Effect of Oxygen and Carbon Dioxide Cross-sensitivity Sensor Error in the Eco Medics Exhalyzer D Device on Measures of Conductive and Acinar Airway Function

Overview
Journal ERJ Open Res
Specialty Pulmonary Medicine
Date 2022 Jul 20
PMID 35854872
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: The multiple breath nitrogen washout (MBNW) test provides important clinical information in obstructive airways diseases. Recently, a significant cross-sensitivity error in the O and CO sensors of a widely used commercial MBNW device (Exhalyzer D, Eco Medics AG, Duernten, Switzerland) was detected, which leads to overestimation of N concentrations. Significant errors in functional residual capacity (FRC) and lung clearance index (LCI) have been reported in infants and children. This study investigated the impact in adults, and on additional important indices reflecting conductive ( ) and acinar ( ) ventilation heterogeneity, in health and disease.

Methods: Existing MBNW measurements of 27 healthy volunteers, 20 participants with asthma and 16 smokers were reanalysed using SPIROWARE V 3.3.1, which incorporates an error correction algorithm. Uncorrected and corrected indices were compared using paired t-tests and Bland-Altman plots.

Results: Correction of the sensor error significantly lowered FRC (mean difference 9%) and LCI (8-10%) across all three groups. was higher following correction (11%, 14% and 36% in health, asthma and smokers, respectively) with significant proportional bias. was significantly lower following correction in the asthma and smoker groups, but the effect was small (2-5%) and with no proportional bias.

Discussion: The O and CO cross-sensitivity sensor error significantly overestimated FRC and LCI in adults, consistent with data in infants and children. There was a high degree of underestimation of but minimal impact on . The presence of significant proportional bias indicates that previous studies will require reanalysis to confirm previous findings and to allow comparability with future studies.

References
1.
Robinson P, Latzin P, Verbanck S, Hall G, Horsley A, Gappa M . Consensus statement for inert gas washout measurement using multiple- and single- breath tests. Eur Respir J. 2013; 41(3):507-22. DOI: 10.1183/09031936.00069712. View

2.
Tonga K, Robinson P, Farah C, King G, Thamrin C . and functional residual capacity comparisons between multiple-breath nitrogen washout devices. ERJ Open Res. 2017; 3(4). PMC: 5703358. DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00011-2017. View

3.
Handley B, Jeagal E, Schoeffel R, Badal T, Chapman D, Farrow C . Controlled free breathing for multiple breath nitrogen washout in healthy adults. ERJ Open Res. 2021; 7(1). PMC: 7836463. DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00435-2020. View

4.
Poncin W, Singer F, Aubriot A, Lebecque P . Agreement between multiple-breath nitrogen washout systems in children and adults. J Cyst Fibros. 2016; 16(2):258-266. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcf.2016.11.004. View

5.
Jetmalani K, Chapman D, Thamrin C, Farah C, Berend N, Salome C . Bronchodilator responsiveness of peripheral airways in smokers with normal spirometry. Respirology. 2016; 21(7):1270-6. DOI: 10.1111/resp.12802. View