» Articles » PMID: 35854804

Combined Abnormalities of Femoral Version and Acetabular Version and McKibbin Index in FAI Patients Evaluated for Hip Preservation Surgery

Overview
Date 2022 Jul 20
PMID 35854804
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Frequencies of combined abnormalities of femoral version (FV) and acetabular version (AV) and of abnormalities of the McKibbin index are unknown. To investigate the prevalence of combined abnormalities of FV and AV and of abnormalities of the McKibbin index in symptomatic patients with femoroacetabular impingement (FAI), a retrospective, Institutional Review Board (IRB)-approved study of 333 symptomatic patients (384 hips) that were presented with hip pain and FAI was performed. The computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging based measurement of central AV, cranial AV and FV was compared among five subgroups with distinguished FAI subgroups and patients that underwent a hip preservation surgery. The allocation to each subgroup was based on AP radiographs. Normal AV and FV were 10-25°. The McKibbin index is the sum of central AV and FV. Of patients that underwent a hip preservation surgery, 73% had a normal McKibbin index (20-50°) but 27% had an abnormal McKibbin index. Of all patients, 72% had a normal McKibbin index, but 28% had abnormal McKibbin index. The prevalence of combined abnormalities of FV and AV varied among subgroups: a higher prevalence of decreased central AV combined with decreased FV of patients with acetabular-retroversion group (12%) and overcoverage (11%) was found compared with mixed-type FAI (5%). Normal AV combined with normal FV was present in 41% of patients with cam-type FAI and in 34% of patients with overcoverage. Patients that underwent a hip preservation surgery had normal mean FV (17 ± 11°), central AV (19 ± 7°), cranial AV (16 ± 10°) and McKibbin index (36 ± 14°). Frequency of combined abnormalities of AV and FV differs between subgroups of FAI patients. Aggravated and compensated McKibbin index was prevalent in FAI patients. This has implications for open hip preservation surgery (surgical hip dislocation or femoral derotation osteotomy) or hip arthroscopy or non-operative treatment.

Citing Articles

The Alpha Angle.

Ekhtiari S, Fairhurst O, Mainwaring L, Khanduja V J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2024; 106(20):1910-1921.

PMID: 39283954 PMC: 11593979. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.23.01089.


Technical note-the use of an inclinometer to accurately guide intra-operative femoral de-rotational osteotomies.

Mayne A, Diamond O J Hip Preserv Surg. 2024; 10(3-4):253-255.

PMID: 38628399 PMC: 11018538. DOI: 10.1093/jhps/hnad021.


Relative Acetabular Retroversion and Its Association With Earlier-Onset Symptomatic Osteoarthritis of the Hip.

Rezaei A, Michael S, Eldib A, Puri L Arthroplast Today. 2024; 26:101322.

PMID: 38455866 PMC: 10918484. DOI: 10.1016/j.artd.2024.101322.


The Effect of Pelvic Incidence on Outcomes After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement and Acetabular Labral Tears.

Torabian K, Cherian N, Eberlin C, Dean M, Dowley K, LaPorte Z Am J Sports Med. 2024; 52(3):631-642.

PMID: 38369972 PMC: 10905981. DOI: 10.1177/03635465231219261.


Proximal femoral derotation osteotomy for management of femoral malversion: a systematic review.

Sohatee M, Jaibaji M, Malviya A J Hip Preserv Surg. 2024; 10(3-4):228-237.

PMID: 38162278 PMC: 10757403. DOI: 10.1093/jhps/hnad024.


References
1.
Ferro F, Ho C, Briggs K, Philippon M . Patient-centered outcomes after hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement and labral tears are not different in patients with normal, high, or low femoral version. Arthroscopy. 2014; 31(3):454-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2014.10.008. View

2.
Lerch T, Eichelberger P, Baur H, Schmaranzer F, Liechti E, Schwab J . Prevalence and diagnostic accuracy of in-toeing and out-toeing of the foot for patients with abnormal femoral torsion and femoroacetabular impingement: implications for hip arthroscopy and femoral derotation osteotomy. Bone Joint J. 2019; 101-B(10):1218-1229. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.101B10.BJJ-2019-0248.R1. View

3.
Strecker W, Keppler P, Gebhard F, Kinzl L . Length and torsion of the lower limb. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1997; 79(6):1019-23. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.79b6.7701. View

4.
Schmaranzer F, Todorski I, Lerch T, Schwab J, Cullmann-Bastian J, Tannast M . Intra-articular Lesions: Imaging and Surgical Correlation. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol. 2017; 21(5):487-506. DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1606133. View

5.
Goronzy J, Blum S, Hartmann A, Plodeck V, Franken L, Gunther K . Is MRI an adequate replacement for CT scans in the three-dimensional assessment of acetabular morphology?. Acta Radiol. 2018; 60(6):726-734. DOI: 10.1177/0284185118795331. View