» Articles » PMID: 35853815

Sixteen-Year National Trends in Use and Outcomes of VA-ECMO in Cardiogenic Shock

Overview
Publisher Elsevier
Date 2022 Jul 19
PMID 35853815
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

There is a lack of data on contemporary trends in the use and outcomes of Veno-Arterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (VA-ECMO) for cardiogenic shock (CS) at a national level. Patients with CS admitted during January 1st, 2002-December 31, 2018, were identified from the United States National Inpatient Sample. Among all patients admitted with CS, those who received VA-ECMO were identified. We report the trends in use and outcomes in terms of mortality, exit strategies and complications among all patients who received VA ECMO for CS. Among a total of approximately 1.6 million patients admitted with CS during the period from January 1st, 2002 to December 31, 2018; 25, 621(1.5 %) received VA-ECMO. There has been a 23-fold increase in the use of VA-ECMO over the study period, from 0.1 % in 2002 to 3 % in 2018, with a simultaneous decreasing trend of in hospital mortality from 77 % in 2002 to 50 % in 2018. Only approximately 15 % of VA-ECMO patients are discharged home with most survivors discharged to a skilled nursing facility or short-term rehabilitation. Moreover, only a minor proportion of patients on VA ECMO are bridged to heart replacement therapy with durable LVAD (6 %) or cardiac transplantation (2.5 %). In conclusion, the use of VA-ECMO in CS has increased 23-fold from January 2002 to December 2018 with a concomitant decrease in mortality from 77 % in 2002 to 50 % in 2018, only a minority of patients on VA-ECMO for CS are bridged to durable LVAD or cardiac transplantation.

Citing Articles

Lung injury in myocardial infarction-associated cardiogenic shock supported by venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: a scoping review.

Zaaqoq A, Mazzeffi M, Vogelsong M, Roeser M, Cho S BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2025; 25(1):40.

PMID: 39849351 PMC: 11756158. DOI: 10.1186/s12872-025-04472-7.


Left ventricular unloading with gentle chest compressions for patients on veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: two case reports.

Jiang L, Huang M, Xiang S, Xiong B, Li G, Zhong Y Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024; 11:1435935.

PMID: 39135616 PMC: 11318276. DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1435935.


An Uneven Playing Field: Demographic and Regionalized Disparities in Access to Device-Based Therapies for Cardiogenic Shock.

Tehrani B, Epps K, Batchelor W J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2024; 3(1):101220.

PMID: 39131975 PMC: 11307875. DOI: 10.1016/j.jscai.2023.101220.


Defining Training in Critical Care Cardiology: What Is the "Gold Standard?".

Wiley B, Zern E JACC Adv. 2024; 3(3):100849.

PMID: 38938824 PMC: 11198660. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2024.100849.


Extracorporeal Life Support in Myocardial Infarction: New Highlights.

Piccone G, Schiavoni L, Mattei A, Benedetto M Medicina (Kaunas). 2024; 60(6).

PMID: 38929524 PMC: 11205984. DOI: 10.3390/medicina60060907.